Leemann, Lucas; Wasserfallen, Fabio (2016). The Democratic Effect of Direct Democracy. American political science review, 110(4), pp. 750-762. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/S0003055416000307
|
Text
leemann_wasserfallen_2016.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (2MB) | Preview |
A key requirement of democratic governance is that policy outcomes and the majority preference of the electorate are congruent. Many studies argue that the more direct democratic a system is, the more often voters get what they want, but the empirical evidence is mixed. This analysis explores the democratic effect of initiatives and referendums theoretically and empirically. The prediction of the formal model is that “bad” representation (i.e., a large preference deviation between the electorate and the political elite) is good for the democratic effect of direct democracy. An empirical investigation of original voter and elite survey data, analyzed with multilevel modeling and poststratification, supports this argument. Building on the literature, the findings of the analysis suggest that the extent to which direct democratic institutions are conducive for policy congruence—and may thus be advisable as democratic correctives to representative systems—depends on the political conflict structure.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Political Science |
UniBE Contributor: |
Wasserfallen, Fabio Adriano |
Subjects: |
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science |
ISSN: |
1537-5943 |
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Mirco Thomas Good |
Date Deposited: |
14 May 2020 13:39 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:37 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1017/S0003055416000307 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.141490 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/141490 |