Comparison of revascularization strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Khan, Mohammad Saud; Khan, Abdur Rahman; Khan, Abdullah Irfan; Seo, Michael; Yasmin, Farah; Usman, Muhammad Shariq; Moustafa, Abdelmoniem; Schmid, Christopher H; Kalra, Ankur; Ikram, Sohail (2020). Comparison of revascularization strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 96(4), E447-E454. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1002/ccd.28855

[img] Text
Khan_CatheterCardiovascInterv_2020.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

Whether revascularization should be performed as multivessel intervention at the time of index procedure (MV-index), staged procedure (MV-staged), or culprit only intervention (COI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unclear. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the optimal revascularization strategy in this patient population.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant studies. The outcomes assessed were major cardiac adverse events (MACE), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) with credible interval (CrI).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 8,066 patients were included in the analysis. There was a decreased risk of MACE (MV-index vs. COI: OR, 0.35; 95% CrI, 0.23-0.55; MV-staged vs COI: OR, 0.52; 95% CrI, 0.31-0.81) and revascularization (MV-index vs. COI: OR, 0.27; 95% CrI, 0.15-0.49; MV-staged vs. COI: OR, 0.38; 95% CrI, 0.19-0.70) with MV-index intervention and MV-staged intervention compared with COI. However, MV-index intervention and not MV-staged intervention was associated with a decreased risk of MI (MV-index vs. COI: OR, 0.35; 95% CrI, 0.12-0.93; MV-staged vs. COI: OR, 0.65; 95% CrI, 0.24-1.59) compared with COI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that multivessel intervention either at index procedure or as staged intervention may be more efficacious compared to COI in patients with MVD presenting with ACS.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Seo, Michael Juhn Uh

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1522-1946

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Andrea Flükiger-Flückiger

Date Deposited:

08 Apr 2020 18:31

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:38

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/ccd.28855

PubMed ID:

32222063

Uncontrolled Keywords:

acute coronary syndrome multivessel disease multivessel intervention network analysis revascularization staged intervention

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.143272

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/143272

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback