Impact of climate and public health interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study.

Jüni, Peter; Rothenbühler, Martina; Bobos, Pavlos; Thorpe, Kevin E; da Costa, Bruno R.; Fisman, David N; Slutsky, Arthur S; Gesink, Dionne (2020). Impact of climate and public health interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study. CMAJ, 192(21), E566-E573. Canadian Medical Association 10.1503/cmaj.200920

Preview	Text Jüni CMAJ 2020_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (814kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Jüni CMAJ 2020_Appendix.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (2MB) | Preview
	Text Jüni CMAJ 2020.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (175kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether seasonal changes, school closures or other public health interventions will result in a slowdown of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to determine whether epidemic growth is globally associated with climate or public health interventions intended to reduce transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of all 144 geopolitical areas worldwide (375 609 cases) with at least 10 COVID-19 cases and local transmission by Mar. 20, 2020, excluding China, South Korea, Iran and Italy. Using weighted random-effects regression, we determined the association between epidemic growth (expressed as ratios of rate ratios [RRR] comparing cumulative counts of COVID-19 cases on Mar. 27, 2020, with cumulative counts on Mar. 20, 2020) and latitude, temperature, humidity, school closures, restrictions of mass gatherings, and measures of social distancing during an exposure period 14 days previously (Mar. 7 to 13, 2020).

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, there were few or no associations of epidemic growth with latitude and temperature, but weak negative associations with relative humidity (RRR per 10% 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.96) and absolute humidity (RRR per 5 g/m3 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99). Strong associations were found for restrictions of mass gatherings (RRR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79), school closures (RRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.78) and measures of social distancing (RRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85). In a multivariable model, there was a strong association with the number of implemented public health interventions (p for trend = 0.001), whereas the association with absolute humidity was no longer significant.

INTERPRETATION

Epidemic growth of COVID-19 was not associated with latitude and temperature, but may be associated weakly with relative or absolute humidity. Conversely, public health interventions were strongly associated with reduced epidemic growth.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

333 since deposited on 12 May 2020
66 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item