How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination

Berger, Joël; Osterloh, Margit; Rost, Katja; Ehrmann, Thomas (2020). How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination. Leadership Quarterly, p. 101388. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101388

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S1048984320300151-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Hubris is a tendency of leaders to hold an overly confident view of their own capabilities and to abuse power for their own selfish goals, sometimes with disastrous consequences for organizations. A major reason for hubris is the rigorous selection process leaders typically undergo. This study proposes a governance mechanism used successfully in history to tackle hubris: partly random selections, which combine competitive selections by competence with lotteries. A frequently voiced concern about the use of lotteries is that it takes no account of the competence of the leader chosen. We propose that partly random selections can mitigate the disadvantages of both competitive selections alone and lotteries alone and reduce hubris in leaders. We conduct a test of this governance mechanism by means of a computerized laboratory experiment. Our results show that partly random selections significantly reduce the hubris of group leaders.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Sociology

UniBE Contributor:

Berger, Joël

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1048-9843

Language:

English

Submitter:

Joël Berger

Date Deposited:

10 Jun 2020 16:06

Last Modified:

11 Jun 2020 01:36

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101388

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Leadership hubris, Appointment methods, Competitive selection, Lottery, Selection combined with lottery, Laboratory experiment

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.144310

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/144310

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback