The Effect of Modality and Landmark Selection on MRI and CT Femoral Torsion Angles.

Schmaranzer, Florian; Kallini, Jennifer R; Miller, Patricia E; Kim, Young-Jo; Bixby, Sarah D; Novais, Eduardo N (2020). The Effect of Modality and Landmark Selection on MRI and CT Femoral Torsion Angles. Radiology, 296(2), pp. 381-390. Radiological Society of North America 10.1148/radiol.2020192723

[img] Text
Effect_Schmaranzer.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Background Assessment of femoral torsion at preoperative hip imaging is commonly recommended. However, it is unclear whether MRI is as accurate as CT and how different methods affect femoral torsion measurements. Purpose To compare MRI- and CT-based assessment of femoral torsion by using four commonly used measurement methods in terms of agreement, reproducibility, and reliability and to compare femoral torsion angles between the four different measurement methods. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated patients with hip pain who underwent CT and 3-T MRI of the hip including sequences of the pelvis and distal condyles between May 2017 and June 2018. The four measurement methods differed regarding the landmark levels for the proximal femoral reference axis and included measurements at the level of the greater trochanter, femoral neck, base of the femoral neck, and level of the lesser trochanter. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated, and Bland-Altman analysis was performed. Results Forty-five patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 19 years ± 5; 27 female) and 57 hips were evaluated. Inter- and intrarater reliability were excellent for each of the four CT- and MRI-based measurement methods (ICC range, 0.97-0.99). Mean difference between CT- and MRI-based measurement ranged from 0.3° ± 3.4 (P = .58) to 2.1° ± 4.1 (P < .001). Differences between CT and MRI were within the corresponding ICC variation for all four measurement methods. Mean torsion angles were greater by 17.6° for CT and 18.7° for MRI (all P < .001) between the most proximal to the most distal measurement methods. Conclusion MRI- and CT-based femoral torsion measurements showed high agreement and comparable reliability and reproducibility but were dependent on the level of selected landmarks used to define the proximal reference axis. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zoga in this issue.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine (DRNN) > Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology

UniBE Contributor:

Schmaranzer, Florian

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1527-1315

Publisher:

Radiological Society of North America

Language:

English

Submitter:

Maria de Fatima Henriques Bernardo

Date Deposited:

30 Jun 2020 16:35

Last Modified:

22 Jul 2020 01:32

Publisher DOI:

10.1148/radiol.2020192723

PubMed ID:

32515680

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.144568

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/144568

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback