Impact of an evidence-based intervention on urinary catheter utilization, associated process indicators, and infectious and non-infectious outcomes.

Schweiger, Alexander; Kuster, Stefan P; Maag, Judith; Züllig, Stephanie; Bertschy, Sonja; Bortolin, Emmanuelle; John, Gregor; Sax, Hugo; Limacher, Andreas; Atkinson, Andrew; Schwappach, David; Marschall, Jonas (2020). Impact of an evidence-based intervention on urinary catheter utilization, associated process indicators, and infectious and non-infectious outcomes. Journal of hospital infection, 106(2), pp. 364-371. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.07.002

[img]
Preview
Text
Schweiger JHospInfect 2020.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (304kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Multicentre intervention studies tackling urinary catheterization and its infections and non-infectious complications are lacking.

AIM

To decrease urinary catheterization and consequently catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and non-infectious complications.

METHODS

Before/after non-randomized multicenter intervention study in seven hospitals in Switzerland. Intervention bundle consisting of 1) a concise list of indications for urinary catheterization, 2) daily evaluation of the need for ongoing catheterization, and 3) education on proper insertion and maintenance of urinary catheters. The primary outcome was urinary catheter utilization. Secondary outcomes were CAUTI, non-infectious complications, and process indicators such as proportion of indicated catheters and frequency of catheter evaluation.

FINDINGS

We included 25,880 patients [13,171 before the intervention (August-October 2016) and 12,709 after the intervention (August-October 2017)]. Catheter utilization dropped from 23.7% to 21.0% (p=0.001), and catheter-days per 100 patient-days from 17.4 to 13.5 (p=0.167). CAUTI remained stable on a low level with 0.02 infections per 100 patient-days (before) and 0.02 infections (after), (p=0.98). Measuring infections per 1,000 catheter-days, the rate was 1.02 (before) and 1.33 (after), (p=0.60). Non-infectious complications dropped significantly, from 0.79 to 0.56 events per 100 patient-days (p<0.001), and from 39.4 to 35.4 events per 1,000 catheter-days (p=0.23). Indicated catheters increased from 74.5% to 90.0% (p<0.001). Reevaluations increased from 168 to 624 per 1,000 catheter-days (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A straightforward bundle of three evidence-based measures reduced catheter utilization and non-infectious complications, whereas the proportion of indicated urinary catheters and daily evaluations increased. The CAUTI rate remained unchanged, albeit on a very low level.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Infectiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Department of Clinical Research (DCR)

UniBE Contributor:

Limacher, Andreas, Atkinson, Andrew David, Schwappach, David, Marschall, Jonas

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0195-6701

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Andrea Flükiger-Flückiger

Date Deposited:

22 Jul 2020 19:45

Last Modified:

20 Feb 2024 14:16

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jhin.2020.07.002

PubMed ID:

32653433

Uncontrolled Keywords:

CAUTI Healthcare-associated infection Hematuria Infection control Urinary catheter

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.145259

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/145259

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback