Clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in low-resource settings - A scoping review.

Schnaubelt, S.; Monsieurs, K. G.; Semeraro, F.; Schlieber, J.; Cheng, A.; Bigham, B. L.; Garg, R.; Finn, J. C.; Greif, R. (2020). Clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in low-resource settings - A scoping review. Resuscitation, 156, pp. 137-145. Elsevier 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.126

[img] Text
Clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital_Greif_Resuscitation_2020.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (643kB)

AIM OF THE SCOPING REVIEW

Scientific recommendations on resuscitation are typically formulated from the perspective of an ideal resource environment, with little consideration of applicability in lower-income countries. We aimed to determine clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in low-resource countries, to identify shortcomings related to resuscitation in these areas and possible solutions, and to suggest future research priorities.

DATA SOURCES

This scoping review was part of the continuous evidence evaluation process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), and was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We identified low-resource countries as countries with a low- or middle gross national income per capita (World Bank data). We performed a literature search on outcomes after OHCA in these countries, and we extracted data on the outcome. We applied descriptive statistics and conducted a post-hoc correlation analysis of cohort size and ROSC rates.

RESULTS

We defined 24 eligible studies originating from middle-income countries, but none from low-income regions, suggesting a reporting bias. The number of reported patients in these studies ranged from 54 to 3214. Utstein-style reporting was rarely used. Return of spontaneous circulation varied from 0% to 62%. Fifteen studies reported on survival to hospital discharge (between 1.0 and 16.7%) or favourable neurological outcome (between 1.0 and 9.3%). An inverse correlation was found for study cohort size and the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ρ = -0.48, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Studies of OHCA outcomes in low-resource countries are heterogeneous and may be compromised by reporting bias. Minimum cardiopulmonary resuscitation standards for low-resource settings should be developed collaboratively involving local experts, respecting culture and context while balancing competing health priorities.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Greif, Robert

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1873-1570

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

06 Oct 2020 17:15

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:40

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.126

PubMed ID:

32920113

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Low resource Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Outcome Scoping review

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.146847

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/146847

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback