Krois, Joachim; Krasowski, Aleksander; Rossi, Jesus Gomez; Paris, Sebastian; Kuhlmey, Adelheid; Meyer-Lückel, Hendrik; Schwendicke, Falk (2021). Underscreening and undertreatment? Periodontal service provision in very old Germans. Clinical oral investigations, 25(5), pp. 3117-3129. Springer-Verlag 10.1007/s00784-020-03635-4
Text
Krois_et_al._Clin_Oral_Investig_2020.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) |
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to assess periodontal services utilization in very old Germans.
METHODS
A comprehensive sample of very old (≥ 75 years), insured at a large Northeastern statutory insurer was followed over 6 years (2012-2017). We assessed periodontal service provision, entailing (1) periodontal screening index (PSI), (2) periodontal status/treatment planning, (3) periodontal therapy (scaling and root planning with or without access surgery), (4) postoperative reevaluation, and (5) any of these four services groups. Association of utilization with (1) sex, (2) age, (3) region, (4) social hardship status, (5) ICD-10 diagnoses, and (6) diagnoses-related groups was explored.
RESULTS
404.610 individuals were followed; 173,733 did not survive follow-up. The mean (SD) age was 81.9 (5.4) years. 29.4% (119,103 individuals) utilized any periodontal service, nearly all of them the PSI. Periodontal status/treatment planning, treatment provision, and reevaluation were provided to only a small fraction (1.54-1.57%, or 6224-6345) of individuals. The utilization of the PSI increased between 2012 and 2017; no such increase was observed for treatment-related services. Utilization decreased with age; those aged > 85 years received nearly no services at all. Decreases were more pronounced for treatment-related services. Utilization was lower in rural than urban areas, those with hardship status, and those severely ill (e.g., dementia, heart insufficiency). In multivariable analysis, a previous PSI measurement tripled the odds of receiving treatment-related services (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 3.0-3.4).
CONCLUSIONS
Periodontal services utilization was low. Screening for periodontal disease significantly increased therapy provision. Social, demographic, regional, and general health aspects were associated with utilization.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The utilization of periodontal services in the very old in Northeast Germany was low, and even screening was only performed in a minority of individuals. Policies to increase identification and management of periodontitis especially in the most vulnerable individuals are needed.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry |
UniBE Contributor: |
Meyer-Lückel, Hendrik |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1432-6981 |
Publisher: |
Springer-Verlag |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Daniela Zesiger |
Date Deposited: |
06 Jan 2021 15:23 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:42 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s00784-020-03635-4 |
PubMed ID: |
33098031 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Access Geriatrics Gerodontology Health services research Periodontal screening index Periodontology |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/148748 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/148748 |