Sadiqi, Said; Post, Marcel W; Hosman, Allard J; Dvorak, Marcel F; Chapman, Jens R; Benneker, Lorin M.; Kandziora, Frank; Rajasekaran, S; Schnake, Klaus J; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Oner, F Cumhur (2021). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma). European spine journal, 30(9), pp. 2631-2644. Springer 10.1007/s00586-020-06554-w
|
Text
Sadiqi2020_Article_ReliabilityValidityAndResponsi.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (3MB) | Preview |
PURPOSE
To validate the Dutch version of AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).
METHODS
Patients were recruited from two level-1 trauma centers from the Netherlands. Next to the AOSpine PROST, patients also filled out SF-36 for concurrent validity. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the characteristics. Content validity was assessed by evaluating the number of inapplicable or missing questions. Also floor and ceiling effects were analyzed. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α and item-total correlation coefficients (itcc). Spearman correlation tests were performed within AOSpine PROST items and in correlation with SF-36. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Responsiveness was assessed by calculating effect sizes (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM). Factor analysis was performed to explore any dimensions within AOSpine PROST.
RESULTS
Out of 179 enrolled patients, 163 (91.1%) were included. Good results were obtained for content validity. No floor or ceiling effects were seen. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.96, itcc 0.50-0.86), with also good Spearman correlations (0.25-0.79). Compared to SF-36, the strongest correlation was seen for physical functioning (0.79; p < .001). Also test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.92). Concerning responsiveness analysis, very good results were seen with ES = 1.81 and SRM = 2.03 (p < 0.001). Factor analysis revealed two possible dimensions (Eigenvalues > 1), explaining 65.4% of variance.
CONCLUSIONS
Very satisfactory results were obtained for reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of AOSpine PROST. Treating surgeons are encouraged to use this novel and validated tool in clinical setting and research to contribute to evidence-based and patient-centered care.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery |
UniBE Contributor: |
Benneker, Lorin Michael |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0940-6719 |
Publisher: |
Springer |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Kathrin Aeschlimann |
Date Deposited: |
28 Dec 2020 17:30 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:42 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s00586-020-06554-w |
PubMed ID: |
32815075 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
AOSpine PROST Function Health Outcome instrument Patient perspective Spine trauma |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/149048 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/149048 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |