Clinical decision rules for termination of resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Lauridsen, Kasper G; Baldi, Enrico; Smyth, Michael; Perkins, Gavin D; Greif, Robert (2021). Clinical decision rules for termination of resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Resuscitation, 158, pp. 23-29. Elsevier Science Ireland 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.036

[img] Text
Clinical_decision_rules_for_Termination_of_Resuscitation_Greif_Resuscitation_2020.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (649kB) | Request a copy

AIM

To assess whether any clinical decision rule for patients sustaining an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) can predict mortality or survival with poor neurological outcome.

METHODS

We searched online databases from inception through July 2020 for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion. We followed PRISMA guidelines for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies framework to evaluate risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to evaluate certainty of evidence. We assessed predictive values for no return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), death before hospital discharge, and survival with unfavorable neurological outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 6436 studies, 92 studies were selected for full-text screening. We included 3 observational studies describing the derivation and external validation for the UN10 rule (Unwitnessed arrest; Nonshockable rhythm; 10 min of resuscitation without ROSC) amongst patients suffering from IHCA. No studies were identified for clinical implementation. Positive Predicted Values (PPV) for death before hospital discharge for the three studies were 100% (95% CI: 97.1%-100%), 98.9% (95% CI: 96.5%-99.7%), and 93.7% (95% CI: 93.3%-94.0%). One study reported a PPV for prediction of survival with unfavorable neurological outcome, 95.2% (95% CI: 94.9%-95.6%). The level of evidence was rated as very low certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified very low certainty evidence for one clinical decision rule (the UN-10 rule) that was unable to reliably predict mortality or survival with unfavorable neurological outcome for adults suffering from IHCA. We identified no evidence for children. PROSPERO CRD42020164091.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Greif, Robert

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0300-9572

Publisher:

Elsevier Science Ireland

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

28 Dec 2020 19:01

Last Modified:

13 Jan 2021 01:34

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.036

PubMed ID:

33197522

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Advanced life support Ethical issues In-hospital cardiac arrest Termination of resuscitation

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/149061

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/149061

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback