Expert consensus on relevant risk predictors for the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures in specific clinical subgroups - Delphi survey.

Bodmer, Nicolas S; Häuselmann, Hans Jörg; Frey, Diana; Aeberli, Daniel; Bachmann, Lucas M (2019). Expert consensus on relevant risk predictors for the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures in specific clinical subgroups - Delphi survey. BMC rheumatology, 3, p. 50. BioMed Central 10.1186/s41927-019-0099-y

[img]
Preview
Text
Expert_consensus_on_relevant_Aeberli_2020.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (546kB) | Preview

Background

There is an ongoing discussion about incorporating additional risk factors to established WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) to improve the prediction accuracy in clinical subgroups. We aimed to reach an expert consensus on possible additional predictive parameters for specific clinical subgroups.

Methods

Two-round modified Delphi survey: We generated a shortlist of experts from the authors' lists of the pertinent literature and complemented the list with experts known to the authors. Participants were asked to name possible relevant risk factors besides the FRAX-parameters for the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Experts specified these possible predictors for specific subgroups of patients. In the second round the expert panel was asked to weight each parameter of every subgroup assigning a number between one (not important) to ten (very important). We defined the threshold for an expert consensus if the interquartile range (IQR) of a predictor was ≤2. The cut-off value of the median attributed weights for a relevant predictor was set at ≥7.

Results

Eleven experts of seven countries completed both rounds of the Delphi. The participants agreed on nine additional parameters for seven categories. For the category "secondary osteoporosis", "older adults" and "nursing home patients", there was a consensus that history of previous falls was relevant, while for men and postmenopausal women, there was a consensus that the spine fracture status was important. For the group "primary and secondary osteoporosis" the experts agreed on the parameters "high risk of falls", "lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD)" and "sarcopenia".

Conclusion

This Delphi survey reached a consensus on various parameters that could be used to refine the currently existing FRAX for specific clinical situations or patient groups. The results may be useful for studies aiming at improving the predictive properties of instruments for fracture prediction.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergology

UniBE Contributor:

Aeberli, Daniel

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2520-1026

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Language:

English

Submitter:

Marlise Bühler Zimmermann

Date Deposited:

13 Jan 2021 11:18

Last Modified:

17 Jan 2021 02:53

Publisher DOI:

10.1186/s41927-019-0099-y

PubMed ID:

31742245

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Delphi consensus method Expert consensus Fracture prediction Older adults Primary osteoporosis Secondary osteoporosis

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/149396

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/149396

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback