Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System.

Vaccaro, Alexander R; Schroeder, Gregory D; Divi, Srikanth N; Kepler, Christopher K; Kleweno, Conor P; Krieg, James C; Wilson, Jefferson R; Holstein, Jörg H; Kurd, Mark F; Firoozabadi, Reza; Vialle, Luiz R; Oner, F Cumhur; Kandziora, Frank; Chapman, Jens R; Schnake, Klaus J; Benneker, Lorin M.; Dvorak, Marcel F; Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; Vialle, Emiliano N; Joaquim, Andrei F; ... (2020). Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System. The journal of bone & joint surgery. American volume, 102(16), pp. 1454-1463. Wolters Kluwer 10.2106/JBJS.19.01153

[img]
Preview
Text
Description_and_Reliability_of_the_AOSpine_Sacral.11.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons.

METHODS

A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3).

RESULTS

Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Benneker, Lorin Michael

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1535-1386

Publisher:

Wolters Kluwer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Kathrin Aeschlimann

Date Deposited:

18 Jan 2021 16:59

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:43

Publisher DOI:

10.2106/JBJS.19.01153

PubMed ID:

32816418

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/150496

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/150496

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback