Trimodal therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer management.

Polo-Alonso, Elvira; Kuk, Cynthia; Guruli, Georgi; Paul, Asit K; Thalmann, George; Kamat, Ashish; Solsona, Eduardo; Thalmann, George; Urdaneta, Alfredo I; Zlotta, Alexandre R; Mir, Maria C (2020). Trimodal therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer management. Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology, 72(6), pp. 650-662. Edizioni Minerva Medica 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04018-7

[img]
Preview
Text
Tha_trimodal_therapy_in_muscle_invasive_bladder_cancer_management.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (405kB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the current mainstay for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Concerns regarding morbidity, mortality and quality of life have favored the introduction of bladder sparing strategies. Trimodal therapy, combining transurethral resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the current standard of care for bladder preservation strategies in selected patients with MIBC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive search of the Medline and Embase databases was performed. A total of 19 studies were included in a systematic review of bladder sparing strategies in MIBC management was carried out following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The overall median complete response rate after trimodal therapy (TMT) was 77% (55-93). Salvage cystectomy rate with TMT was 17% on average (8-30). For TMT, the 5-year cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates range from 42-82% and 32-74%, respectively. Currently data supporting neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in bladder sparing approaches are emerging, but robust definitive conclusions are still lacking. Gastrointestinal toxicity rates are low around 4% (0.5-16), whereas genitourinary toxicity rates reached 8% (1-24). Quality of life outcomes are still underreported.

CONCLUSIONS

Published data and clinical experience strongly support trimodal therapy as an acceptable bladder sparing strategy in terms of oncological outcomes and quality of life in selected patients with MIBC. A strong need exists for specialized centers, to increase awareness among urologists, to discuss these options with patients and to stress the increased participation of patients and their families in treatment path decision-making.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Urology

UniBE Contributor:

Thalmann, George, Thalmann, George

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1827-1758

Publisher:

Edizioni Minerva Medica

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannine Wiemann

Date Deposited:

21 Jan 2021 15:10

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:43

Publisher DOI:

10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04018-7

PubMed ID:

33263367

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/150553

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/150553

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback