Participatory vs expert evaluation styles

Sager, Fritz; Mavrot, Céline (2021). Participatory vs expert evaluation styles. In: Howlett, Michael; Tosun, Jale (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Policy Styles. Routledge international handbooks. London: Routledge

Preview

Text Sager_Mavrot_Routledge_Handbook_of_Policy_Styles_Ed_Howlett_Tosun.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (418kB) | Preview

This chapter focuses on policy evaluation, defined as the assessment of a public policy to determine whether it has achieved its objectives. We discuss two types of policy evaluation: expert evaluation and participatory evaluation. While expert styles insist on the technicality of policy evaluations and on scientific sophistication, participatory styles focus on the integration of policy stakeholders and laypersons during the evaluative process. Because expert evaluation styles are marked by their scientific character and independence, they enjoy a high internal reliability and a result-based legitimacy. In contrast, core features of participatory evaluations styles are their representativeness and transparency, which is associated with external reliability and a process-based legitimacy. The chapter outlines the historical development of these two evaluation styles, and discusses their respective strengths and weaknesses in the light of contemporary decision-making processes. Finally, we discuss the risks associated with technocratic policy evaluation styles on the one hand, and politicized participatory evaluations on the other hand, in the context of post-truth democracy.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

38 since deposited on 25 Mar 2021
36 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item