Studer-Luethi, Barbara; Meier, Beat (2020). Is training with the N-back task more effective than with other tasks? N-back vs. dichotic listening vs. simple listening. Journal of cognitive enhancement, 5(4), pp. 434-448. Springer 10.1007/s41465-020-00202-3
|
Text
Studer-Luethi-Meier2020_Article_IsTrainingWithTheN-BackTaskMor.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (807kB) | Preview |
Cognitive training most commonly uses computerized tasks that stimulate simultaneous cognitive processing in two modalities, such as a dual n-back task with visual and auditive stimuli, or on two receptive channels, such as a listening task with dichotically presented stimuli. The present study was designed to compare a dual n-back task and a dichotic listening (DL) task with an active control condition (a simple listening task) and a no-training control condition for their impact on cognitive performance, daily life memory, and mindfulness. One hundred thirty healthy adults aged 18–55 years were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions. The training consisted of twenty 15-min sessions spread across 4 weeks. The results indicated some improvement on episodic memory tasks and a trend for enhanced performance in an untrained working memory (WM) span task following cognitive training relative to the no-training control group. However, the only differential training effects were found for the DL training in increasing choice reaction performance and a trend for self-reported mindfulness. Transfer to measures of fluid intelligence and memory in daily life did not emerge. Additionally, we found links between self-efficacy and n-back training performance and between emotion regulation and training motivation. Our results contribute to the field of WM training by demonstrating that our listening tasks are comparable in effect to a dual n-back task in slightly improving memory. The possibility of improving attentional control and mindfulness through dichotic listening training is promising and deserves further consideration.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology 07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Cognitive Psychology, Perception and Methodology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Studer, Barbara, Meier, Beat |
Subjects: |
100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology |
ISSN: |
2509-3290 |
Publisher: |
Springer |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Beat Meier |
Date Deposited: |
22 Mar 2021 17:05 |
Last Modified: |
29 Mar 2023 23:37 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s41465-020-00202-3 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/153106 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/153106 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |