Rituximab versus steroids and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial

Scolari, Francesco; Dallera, Nadia; Gesualdo, Loreto; Santoro, Domenico; Pani, Antonello; Santostefano, Marisa; Feriozzi, Sandro; Mani, Laila-Yasmin; Boscutti, Giuliano; Messa, Piergiorgio; Magistroni, Riccardo; Quaglia, Marco; Ponticelli, Claudio; Ravani, Pietro (2019). Rituximab versus steroids and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 9(12), e029232. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029232

[img]
Preview
Text
e029232.full.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (295kB) | Preview

Introduction: Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease may have different long-term outcomes. After 10 years of follow-up, 35%-50% of the untreated patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome may die or progress to end stage renal disease. The 2012 KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines recommend that initial therapy should consist of alternating steroids and an alkylating agent for 6 months. Recent observational studies showed that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab may be effective in inducing remission. We designed a pilot multicentre randomised trial to inform the design of a larger trial testing the efficacy and safety of treatment with steroids and cyclophosphamide versus rituximab in patients with primary MN and heavy proteinuria (>3.5 g/24 hours).
Methods and analysis: This pilot, open-label, two-parallel-arm, randomised clinical trial will enrol 70 patients with primary MN and heavy proteinuria. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention arm (rituximab) or the active comparator arm (corticosteroid/alkylating-agent therapy). The study will provide estimates of the probability of complete remission of proteinuria and risk of serious side effects at 12 months to inform the design of a larger trial. We will also assess the recruitment potential of each participating centre to address study feasibility.
Ethics and dissemination: The trial received ethics approval from the local ethics boards. We will publish pilot data to inform the design of a larger clinical trial.
Trial registration numbers: NCT03018535; 2011-006115-59.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension

UniBE Contributor:

Mani, Laila-Yasmin

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2044-6055

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Laila-Yasmin Mani

Date Deposited:

16 Mar 2021 08:45

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:48

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029232

PubMed ID:

31806605

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/153109

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/153109

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback