Feeling of guilt explains why people react differently to resource depletion warnings

Baumgartner, Thomas; Lobmaier, Janek S.; Ruffieux, Nicole; Knoch, Daria (2021). Feeling of guilt explains why people react differently to resource depletion warnings. Scientific reports, 11(11988), pp. 1-10. Springer Nature 10.1038/s41598-021-91472-0

[img]
Preview
Text
Baumgartner_et_al._ScientificReports2021.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Despite insistent warnings from climate scientists, the global environmental situation is further deteriorating. To date, only very few studies have investigated the impact of warnings on sustainable decision-making in controlled laboratory settings. Moreover, the few existing studies mainly looked at average warning reactions rather than taking individual differences into account. Here, we investigated individual differences in the reaction to resource depletion warnings and scrutinized the impact of emotions on behavioural changes by applying a resource dilemma task with warnings. Data-driven and model-free cluster analyses identified four different types of consumption behaviour. Importantly, guilt was positively related to sustainable decision-making after warnings. In contrast, a lack of guilt was associated with no behavioural change or even worse with more unsustainable behaviour after warnings. These findings contribute to the debate over effective climate change communication by demonstrating that issuing warnings about the climate crisis only leads to the intended behavioural changes if people experience guilt.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Social Neuroscience and Social Psychology

UniBE Contributor:

Baumgartner, Thomas; Lobmaier, Janek; Ruffieux, Nicole and Knoch, Daria

Subjects:

100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology

ISSN:

2045-2322

Publisher:

Springer Nature

Language:

English

Submitter:

Thomas Baumgartner

Date Deposited:

11 Jun 2021 11:16

Last Modified:

11 Jun 2021 11:16

Publisher DOI:

10.1038/s41598-021-91472-0

PubMed ID:

34099812

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/156791

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/156791

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback