Categories of context in realist evaluation.

Sheaff, Rod; Doran, Natasha; Harris, Michael; Lang, Iain; Medina-Lara, Antionieta; Fornasiero, Mauro; Ball, Susan; McGregor-Harper, Judith; Bethune, Rob (2021). Categories of context in realist evaluation. Evaluation - the international journal of theory, research and practice, 27(2), pp. 184-209. Sage Publications 10.1177/1356389020968578

Preview	Text Sheaff_Evaluation_2021_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (361kB) | Preview
	Text Sheaff_Evaluation_2021_epub.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (936kB)

Realist evaluation has become widespread partly because of its sensitivity to the influence of contexts on policy implementation. In many such evaluations, the range of contexts considered relevant nevertheless remains disparate and under-conceptualised. This article uses findings from a realist evaluation of English Patient Safety Collaboratives during 2015–2018 to develop a realist taxonomy of contexts, differentiating contexts according to how they affect the corresponding policy mechanism. By analysing the main context-mechanism-outcome configurations that made up the English Patient Safety Collaboratives, we derive a taxonomy of the contexts that affected implementation and outcomes. The categories of context were structural (network, hierarchy, market and organisational contexts); resource-based (actors, material, financial); motivational (receptivity, outcome headroom), and temporal (continuity, history and convergence). To the categories found in previous studies, this study adds the three temporal contexts.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

247 since deposited on 28 Jul 2021
109 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item