Narrative strategies in a nondemocratic setting: Moscow’s urban policy debates

Schlaufer, Caroline; Gafurova, Dilyara; Zhyriakova, Ekaterina; Shikhova, Marina; Belyaeva, Nina (2021). Narrative strategies in a nondemocratic setting: Moscow’s urban policy debates. Policy studies journal, 51(1), pp. 79-100. Policy Studies Organization 10.1111/psj.12445

Text psj.12445.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (530kB)

The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) explains the role of narratives in policy processes. The NPF was developed for democratic contexts and has not been systematically applied in a nondemocratic setting. This study fills this gap with an empirical analysis of narrative strategies used by governmental and oppositional actors in urban policy debates in Moscow. Results show how governmental actors consistently use angel shifts, contain issues, and avoid using causal mechanisms, while actors opposing governmental policy use devil shifts, expand issues, and use intentional causal mechanisms. The findings suggest that narrative strategies differ depending on whether policy actors seek to promote policy reforms or draw attention to problems. We argue that policy actors’ objectives are a wellsuited predictor for narrative strategies in both democratic and nondemocratic contexts.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

7 since deposited on 29 Sep 2021
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item