Survival after inpatient or outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Guler, Sabina Anna; Hur, Seo Am; Stickland, Michael K; Brun, Patrick; Bovet, Luc; Holland, Anne E; Bondarenko, Janet; Hambly, Nathan; Wald, Joshua; Makhdami, Nima; Kreuter, Michael; Gloeckl, Rainer; Jarosch, Inga; Tan, Benjamin; Johannson, Kerri A; McBride, S Ainslie; De Boer, Kaissa; Sandoz, Jacqueline S; Sun, Kelly; Assayag, Deborah; ... (2022). Survival after inpatient or outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Thorax, 77(6), pp. 589-595. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217361

[img] Text
Guler_Sabina_Survival_after_PRinILD_Guler_Thorax2021.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

The impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on survival in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unknown. Given the challenges conducting a large randomised controlled trial, we aimed to determine whether improvement in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was associated with better survival.

METHODS

This retrospective, international cohort study included patients with fibrotic ILD participating in either inpatient or outpatient PR at 12 sites in 5 countries. Multivariable models were used to estimate the association between change in 6MWD and time to death or lung transplantation accounting for clustering by centre and other confounders.

RESULTS

701 participants (445 men and 256 women) with fibrotic ILD were included. The mean±SD ages of the 196 inpatients and 505 outpatients were 70±11 and 69±12 years, respectively. Baseline/changes in 6MWD were 262±128/55±83 m for inpatients and 358±125/34±65 m for outpatients. Improvement in 6MWD during PR was associated with lower hazard rates for death or lung transplant on adjusted analysis for both inpatient (HR per 10 m 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p<0.001) and outpatient PR (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.00, p=0.042). Participation in ≥80% of planned outpatient PR sessions was associated with a 33% lower risk of death (95% CI 0.49% to 0.92%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with fibrotic ILD who improved physical performance during PR had better survival compared with those who did not improve performance. Confirmation of these hypothesis-generating findings in a randomised controlled trial would be required to definitely change clinical practice, and would further support efforts to improve availability of PR for patients with fibrotic ILD.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gastro-intestinal, Liver and Lung Disorders (DMLL) > Clinic of Pneumology

UniBE Contributor:

Guler, Sabina Anna, Brun, Patrick

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0040-6376

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Heidi Lobsiger

Date Deposited:

21 Sep 2021 14:52

Last Modified:

02 Mar 2023 23:35

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217361

PubMed ID:

34462346

Uncontrolled Keywords:

exercise idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis interstitial fibrosis pulmonary rehabilitation

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/159149

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/159149

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback