Punitiveness of electronic monitoring: Perception and experience of an alternative sanction

Richter, Marina; Ryser, Barbara; Hostettler, Ueli (2021). Punitiveness of electronic monitoring: Perception and experience of an alternative sanction. European journal of probation, 13(3), pp. 262-281. Sage 10.1177/20662203211038489

Preview

Text 20662203211038489.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (625kB) | Preview

Electronic monitoring (EM) serves as an alternative sanction to incarceration. An important aspect that remains only scarcely debated in the literature is EM’s punitiveness and, more specifically, exactly how punitive EM is in comparison to different forms of incarceration. Responding to this gap, we propose a systematic meta-analysis of relevant studies that scrutinizes and compares different studies on EM and its punitive effects (or perceptions of its degree of punitiveness) in relation to incarceration. Ultimately, there is no simple and straightforward answer: EM’s level of punitiveness differs with the various sociodemographic variables of respondents included in the studies and the various characteristics of the penal system. It is necessary to assess the degree of punitiveness of EM to determine the conditions under and terms with which it should be applied, for example, as a humane substitute for incarceration or as an additional pain of the penal system.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

143 since deposited on 30 Sep 2021
56 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item