An international comparison of long‐term care trajectories and spending following hip fracture

Wodchis, Walter P.; Or, Zeynep; Blankart, Carl Rudolf; Atsma, Femke; Janlov, Nils; Bai, Yu Qing; Penneau, Anne; Arvin, Mina; Knight, Hannah; Riley, Kristen; Figueroa, Jose F.; Papanicolas, Irene (2021). An international comparison of long‐term care trajectories and spending following hip fracture. Health Services Research, 56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3), pp. 1383-1393. Wiley 10.1111/1475-6773.13864

Text 1475-6773.13864.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Objective
The objectives of this study are to compare the relative use of different postacute care settings in different countries and to compare three important outcomes as follows: total expenditure, total days of care in different care settings, and overall longevity over a 1-year period following a hip fracture.

Data Sources
We used administrative data from hospitals, institutional and home-based long-term care (LTC), physician visits, and medications compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) from five countries as follows: Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden.

Data Extraction Methods
Data were extracted from existing administrative data systems in each participating country.

Study Design
This is a retrospective cohort study of all individuals admitted to acute care for hip fracture. Descriptive comparisons were used to examine aggregate institutional and home-based postacute care. Care trajectories were created to track sequential care settings after acute-care discharge through institutional and community-based care in three countries where detailed information allowed. Comparisons in patient characteristics, utilization, and costs were made across these trajectories and countries.

Principal Findings
Across five countries with complete LTC data, we found notable variations with Germany having the highest days of home-based services with relatively low costs, while Sweden incurred the highest overall expenditures. Comparisons of trajectories found that France had the highest use of inpatient rehabilitation. Germany was most likely to discharge hip fracture patients to home. Over 365 days, France averaged the highest number of days in institution with 104, Canada followed at 94, and Germany had just 87 days of institutional care on average.

Conclusion
In this comparison of LTC services following a hip fracture, we found international differences in total use of institutional and noninstitutional care, longevity, and total expenditures. There exist opportunities to organize postacute care differently to maximize independence and mitigate costs.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 04 Oct 2021
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item