Extended venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valeriani, Emanuele; Potere, Nicola; Candeloro, Matteo; Spoto, Silvia; Porreca, Ettore; Rutjes, Anne WS; Di Nisio, Marcello (2022). Extended venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of internal medicine, 95, pp. 80-86. Pozzi 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.09.016

[img] Text
Valeriani_EurJInternMed_2022.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB)

INTRODUCTION

Patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that may persist beyond the currently recommended period of 6 to 14 days of thromboprophylaxis. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of extended venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched up to December 2020 for randomized controlled trials comparing extended versus standard venous thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic or symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and VTE-related death. The safety outcome was major bleeding. Summary risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials enrolling 33718 patients were included. Of 4330 (12.8%) patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke, 2152 (49.7%) received extended thromboprophylaxis for four to five weeks with betrixaban (n = 405, 18.8%), enoxaparin (n = 198, 9.2%), or rivaroxaban (n = 1549, 72.0%), and 2178 (50.3%) received standard venous thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin. VTE risk was lower in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving extended thromboprophylaxis (RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.04; 13 fewer per 1000), whereas the increase in major bleeding seemed trivial when compared with standard prophylaxis (RR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.31 to 3.95; 1 more per 1000).

CONCLUSION

In patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke, the net clinical benefit may favor extended venous thromboprophylaxis for four to five weeks over standard thromboprophylaxis.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Rutjes, Anne

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0953-6205

Publisher:

Pozzi

Language:

English

Submitter:

Beatrice Minder Wyssmann

Date Deposited:

22 Oct 2021 12:54

Last Modified:

29 Dec 2022 13:15

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.ejim.2021.09.016

PubMed ID:

34649783

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Acute stroke Direct-acting oral anticoagulant Heparin Prophylaxis Venous thromboembolism

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/160270

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/160270

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback