Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: discrepancy according to different algorithms.

Nussbaumer, Mirjam; Kieninger, Elisabeth; Tschanz, Stefan A.; Savas, Sibel T; Casaulta, Carmen; Goutaki, Myrofora; Blanchon, Sylvain; Jung, Andreas; Regamey, Nicolas; Kuehni, Claudia E.; Latzin, Philipp; Müller, Loretta Lina (2021). Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: discrepancy according to different algorithms. ERJ Open Research, 7(4), 00353-2021. European Respiratory Society 10.1183/23120541.00353-2021

[img]
Preview
Text
Nussbauer_ERJOpenRes_2021.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (1MB) | Preview

Background

Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is challenging since there is no gold standard test. The European Respiratory (ERS) and American Thoracic (ATS) Societies developed evidence-based diagnostic guidelines with considerable differences.

Objective

We aimed to compare the algorithms published by the ERS and the ATS with each other and with our own PCD-UNIBE algorithm in a clinical setting. Our algorithm is similar to the ERS algorithm with additional immunofluorescence staining. Agreement (Cohen's κ) and concordance between the three algorithms were assessed in patients with suspicion of PCD referred to our diagnostic centre.

Results

In 46 out of 54 patients (85%) the final diagnosis was concordant between all three algorithms (30 PCD negative, 16 PCD positive). In eight patients (15%) PCD diagnosis differed between the algorithms. Five patients (9%) were diagnosed as PCD only by the ATS, one (2%) only by the ERS and PCD-UNIBE, one (2%) only by the ATS and PCD-UNIBE, and one (2%) only by the PCD-UNIBE algorithm. Agreement was substantial between the ERS and the ATS (κ=0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.92) and the ATS and the PCD-UNIBE (κ=0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.92) and almost perfect between the ERS and the PCD-UNIBE algorithms (κ=0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.00).

Conclusion

The different diagnostic algorithms lead to a contradictory diagnosis in a considerable proportion of patients. Thus, an updated, internationally harmonised and standardised PCD diagnostic algorithm is needed to improve diagnostics for these discordant cases.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > Unit Childrens Hospital > Forschungsgruppe Pneumologie (Pädiatrie)

UniBE Contributor:

Nussbaumer, Mirjam, Kieninger, Elisabeth, Tschanz, Stefan A., Casaulta, Carmen, Goutaki, Myrofora, Kühni, Claudia, Latzin, Philipp, Müller, Loretta Lina (A)

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2312-0541

Publisher:

European Respiratory Society

Funders:

[204] Swiss Lung Association = Lungenliga Schweiz

Language:

English

Submitter:

Anette van Dorland

Date Deposited:

05 Nov 2021 20:10

Last Modified:

29 Mar 2023 23:37

Publisher DOI:

10.1183/23120541.00353-2021

PubMed ID:

34729370

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/160760

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/160760

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback