Early versus late start of direct oral anticoagulants after acute ischaemic stroke linked to atrial fibrillation: an observational study and individual patient data pooled analysis.

De Marchis, Gian Marco; Seiffge, David J.; Schaedelin, Sabine; Wilson, Duncan; Caso, Valeria; Acciarresi, Monica; Tsivgoulis, Georgios; Koga, Masatoshi; Yoshimura, Sohei; Toyoda, Kazunori; Cappellari, Manuel; Bonetti, Bruno; Macha, Kosmas; Kallmünzer, Bernd; Cereda, Carlo W; Lyrer, Philippe; Bonati, Leo H; Paciaroni, Maurizio; Engelter, Stefan T and Werring, David J (2022). Early versus late start of direct oral anticoagulants after acute ischaemic stroke linked to atrial fibrillation: an observational study and individual patient data pooled analysis. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 93(2), pp. 119-125. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327236

[img] Text
De_Marchis_Seiffge__2021__Early_versus_late_start_of_direct_oral_anticoagulants.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (497kB)

OBJECTIVE

The optimal timing to start direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) related to atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We aimed to compare early (≤5 days of AIS) versus late (>5 days of AIS) DOAC-start.

METHODS

This is an individual patient data pooled analysis of eight prospective European and Japanese cohort studies. We included patients with AIS related to non-valvular AF where a DOAC was started within 30 days. Primary endpoints were 30-day rates of recurrent AIS and ICH.

RESULTS

A total of 2550 patients were included. DOACs were started early in 1362 (53%) patients, late in 1188 (47%). During 212 patient-years, 37 patients had a recurrent AIS (1.5%), 16 (43%) before a DOAC was started; 6 patients (0.2%) had an ICH, all after DOAC-start. In the early DOAC-start group, 23 patients (1.7%) suffered from a recurrent AIS, while 2 patients (0.1%) had an ICH. In the late DOAC-start group, 14 patients (1.2%) suffered from a recurrent AIS; 4 patients (0.3%) suffered from ICH. In the propensity score-adjusted comparison of late versus early DOAC-start groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazard of recurrent AIS (aHR=1.2, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.9, p=0.69), ICH (aHR=6.0, 95% CI 0.6 to 56.3, p=0.12) or any stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not corroborate concerns that an early DOAC-start might excessively increase the risk of ICH. The sevenfold higher risk of recurrent AIS than ICH suggests that an early DOAC-start might be reasonable, supporting enrolment into randomised trials comparing an early versus late DOAC-start.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Neurology

UniBE Contributor:

Seiffge, David Julian

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1468-330X

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Chantal Kottler

Date Deposited:

24 Nov 2021 08:19

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/jnnp-2021-327236

PubMed ID:

34635567

Uncontrolled Keywords:

cerebrovascular disease stroke

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/160836

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/160836

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback