International Evidence Based Reappraisal of Genes Associated With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Using the Clinical Genome Resource Framework.

James, Cynthia A; Jongbloed, Jan D H; Hershberger, Ray E; Morales, Ana; Judge, Daniel P; Syrris, Petros; Pilichou, Kalliopi; Domingo, Argelia Medeiros; Murray, Brittney; Cadrin-Tourigny, Julia; Lekanne Deprez, Ronald; Celeghin, Rudy; Protonotarios, Alexandros; Asatryan, Babken; Brown, Emily; Jordan, Elizabeth; McGlaughon, Jennifer; Thaxton, Courtney; Kurtz, C Lisa and van Tintelen, J Peter (2021). International Evidence Based Reappraisal of Genes Associated With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Using the Clinical Genome Resource Framework. Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, 14(3), e003273. American Heart Association 10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003273

[img]
Preview
Text
2021_International_Evidence_Based_Reappraisal_of_Genes_Associated_With_ARVC_Using_the_ClinGen_Framework.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (911kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited disease characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and progressive ventricular dysfunction. Genetic testing is recommended, and a pathogenic variant in an ARVC-associated gene is a major criterion for diagnosis according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria. As incorrect attribution of a gene to ARVC can contribute to misdiagnosis, we assembled an international multidisciplinary ARVC Clinical Genome Resource Gene Curation Expert Panel to reappraise all reported ARVC genes.

METHODS

Following a comprehensive literature search, six 2-member teams conducted blinded independent curation of reported ARVC genes using the semiquantitative Clinical Genome Resource framework.

RESULTS

Of 26 reported ARVC genes, only 6 (PKP2, DSP, DSG2, DSC2, JUP, and TMEM43) had strong evidence and were classified as definitive for ARVC causation. There was moderate evidence for 2 genes, DES and PLN. The remaining 18 genes had limited or no evidence. RYR2 was refuted as an ARVC gene since clinical data and model systems exhibited a catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia phenotype. In ClinVar, only 5 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (1.1%) in limited evidence genes had been reported in ARVC cases in contrast to 450 desmosome gene variants (97.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Clinical Genome Resource approach to gene-disease curation, only 8 genes (PKP2, DSP, DSG2, DSC2, JUP, TMEM43, PLN, and DES) had definitive or moderate evidence for ARVC, and these genes accounted for nearly all pathogenic/likely pathogenic ARVC variants in ClinVar. Therefore, only pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in these 8 genes should yield a major criterion for ARVC diagnosis. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in other genes in a patient should prompt further phenotyping as variants in many of these genes are associated with other cardiovascular conditions.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Asatryan, Babken

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2574-8300

Publisher:

American Heart Association

Language:

English

Submitter:

Babken Asatryan

Date Deposited:

03 Dec 2021 11:04

Last Modified:

22 Jan 2023 21:48

Publisher DOI:

10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003273

PubMed ID:

33831308

Uncontrolled Keywords:

desmosomes diagnosis genes genetic testing tachycardia

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/160958

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/160958

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback