Lower airway clinical outcome measures for use in primary ciliary dyskinesia research: a scoping review.

Gahleitner, Florian; Thompson, James; Jackson, Claire L; Hueppe, Jana F; Behan, Laura; Dehlink, Eleonora; Goutaki, Myrofora; Halbeisen, Florian; Queiroz, Ana Paula L; Thouvenin, Guillaume; Kuehni, Claudia E.; Latzin, Philipp; Lucas, Jane S; Rubbo, Bruna (2021). Lower airway clinical outcome measures for use in primary ciliary dyskinesia research: a scoping review. ERJ Open Research, 7(4), 00320-2021. European Respiratory Society 10.1183/23120541.00320-2021

[img]
Preview
Text
Gahleitner_ERJOpenRes_2021.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (1MB) | Preview

Objectives

Disease-specific, well-defined and validated clinical outcome measures are essential in designing research studies. Poorly defined outcome measures hamper pooling of data and comparisons between studies. We aimed to identify and describe pulmonary outcome measures that could be used for follow-up of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD).

Methods

We conducted a scoping review by systematically searching MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews online databases for studies published from 1996 to 2020 that included ≥10 PCD adult and/or paediatric patients.

Results

We included 102 studies (7289 patients). 83 studies reported on spirometry, 11 on body plethysmography, 15 on multiple-breath washout, 36 on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), 57 on microbiology and 17 on health-related quality of life. Measurement and reporting of outcomes varied considerably between studies (e.g. different scoring systems for chest HRCT scans). Additionally, definitions of outcome measures varied (e.g. definition of chronic colonisation by respiratory pathogen), impeding direct comparisons of results.

Conclusions

This review highlights the need for standardisation of measurements and reporting of outcome measures to enable comparisons between studies. Defining a core set of clinical outcome measures is necessary to ensure reproducibility of results and for use in future trials and prospective cohorts.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > Unit Childrens Hospital > Forschungsgruppe Pneumologie (Pädiatrie)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Paediatric Medicine > Paediatric Pneumology

UniBE Contributor:

Goutaki, Myrofora, Halbeisen, Florian Samuel, Kühni, Claudia, Latzin, Philipp

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2312-0541

Publisher:

European Respiratory Society

Language:

English

Submitter:

Anette van Dorland

Date Deposited:

10 Dec 2021 09:38

Last Modified:

02 Mar 2023 23:35

Publisher DOI:

10.1183/23120541.00320-2021

PubMed ID:

34853782

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/162016

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/162016

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback