The impact of the size of bone substitute granules on macrophage and osteoblast behaviors in vitro.

Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako; Katagiri, Hiroki; Kono, Michihide; Schaller, Benoit; Iizuka, Tateyuki; Safi, Ali-Farid (2021). The impact of the size of bone substitute granules on macrophage and osteoblast behaviors in vitro. Clinical oral investigations, 25(8), pp. 4949-4958. Springer 10.1007/s00784-021-03804-z

Preview

Text Fujioka-Kobayashi2021_Article_TheImpactOfTheSizeOfBoneSubsti.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (4MB) | Preview

OBJECTIVE

Bone substitute (BS) size might influence the clinical outcomes of guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of BS size on macrophage (Mφ) and osteoblast behaviors in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two different granule sizes (S and M/L) were assessed for four different commercial BSs: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), biphasic calcium phosphate type 1 (BCP1), BCP type 2 (BCP2), and carbonate apatite (CO3Ap). The BSs were compared for their impacts on the cell viability and differentiation potential of THP-1-derived Mφs and human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells.

RESULTS

The smaller granules showed higher material volumes and surface areas than the larger granules. Significantly higher viability of Mφs and Saos-2 cells was observed with the DBBM_L-size granules than with the DBBM_S-size granules. Gene expression experiments in Mφs revealed few differences between the two sizes of each BS, although higher CD206 mRNA levels were observed in the BCP1_L group and the CO3Ap_M group than in the respective S-size groups on day 1. Only DBBM showed significantly higher mRNA levels of osteogenic markers, including Runx2 and osteocalcin, in Saos-2 cells in the S-size group than in the L-size group.

CONCLUSIONS

The S-size and L-size DBBM granules exhibited clear differences in cell outcomes: cells cultured on the S-size granules exhibited lower cell viability, higher osteopromotive ability, and no noticeable Mφ polarization changes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A smaller granule size might be advantageous due to greater bone regeneration potential in the use of DBBM granules to treat defects.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

25 since deposited on 24 Jan 2022
19 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item