Implementation study of the 2021 German guideline for diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Mokry, C; Warnke, C; Gehring, K; Hegen, H; Salmen, A; Kraemer, M; Kleiter, I; Fasshauer, E; Scheiderbauer, J; Lühmann, D; Köpke, S; Berthele, A; Heesen, C (2022). Implementation study of the 2021 German guideline for diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 57, p. 103434. Elsevier 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103434

[img] Text
Mokry__2021__Implementation_study_of_teh_2021_German_guideline.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (860kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

In May 2021, a new guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis and related disorders was released in Germany. Since the success of a guideline depends on how it integrates into everyday clinical practice, the German Society for Neurology (DGN) has launched a multimethod implementation project. Here we report on the results based on the consultation version of the guideline.

METHODS

We used qualitative and quantitative data analyses to capture the nature and extent of barriers and facilitating factors to the implementation. We centered on the guideline's chapter A on diagnosis, relapse therapy, and immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis. We performed nine online focus group discussions and a web-based survey and analyzed emails and letters with comments from stakeholders and independent parties that were sent spontaneously or by invitation.

RESULTS

94 neurologists answered the survey, and ≥70% agreed with the recommendations of the guideline on each major content topic. Barriers to implementation were detected in group discussions and written input. The most controversial issues of the guideline were "early treatment", "criteria for starting or switching therapy", "stepwise escalation versus early aggressive treatment", "classification of drugs into three categories of efficacy" and the scenarios on "treatment cessation". Some appreciated the highly structured recommendations, but others felt that the guideline restricts the free choice of therapy, or they were afraid of recourse claims. Some considered the guideline as too cautious regarding treatment initiation, possibly delaying necessary therapies. Others appreciated that conflicts of interests of the guideline's authoring group were minimized and thought that the new guideline is clearer, more extensive and practical.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the survey, feedback in the focus group discussions and from individuals was diverse and sometimes more critical. Based on the overall feedback rate of about 250 people in relation to the number of 6500 board-certified neurologists in Germany, the overall appreciation of the guideline can only be considered as an indicator and not proof of acceptance. Results of this analysis were incorporated into several adjustments to the final guideline of 2021. Since the guideline is to be updated regularly under the auspices of a "living guideline", active interaction with users will continue to matter and help to improve it.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Neurology

UniBE Contributor:

Salmen, Anke

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2211-0348

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Chantal Kottler

Date Deposited:

25 Jan 2022 13:57

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 16:00

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.msard.2021.103434

PubMed ID:

34920249

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Immunotherapy Implementation study Multiple sclerosis practice guideline Pulsed MS therapies Treatment algorithm Treatment stop

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/163568

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/163568

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback