Longitudinal Doppler Assessments in Late Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction.

Mylrea-Foley, Bronacha; Wolf, Hans; Stampalija, Tamara; Lees, Christoph; Arabin, B; Berger, A; Bergman, E; Bhide, A; Bilardo, C M; Breeze, A C; Brodszki, J; Calda, P; Cetin, I; Cesari, E; Derks, J; Ebbing, C; Ferrazzi, E; Ganzevoort, W; Frusca, T; Gordijn, S J; ... (2023). Longitudinal Doppler Assessments in Late Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction. Ultraschall in der Medizin, 44(1), pp. 56-67. Thieme 10.1055/a-1511-8293

[img] Text
34768305_a-1511-8293.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (597kB)

PURPOSE

To assess the longitudinal variation of the ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility index (UCR) in late preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective European multicenter observational study included women with a singleton pregnancy, 32+ 0-36+ 6, at risk of FGR (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or abdominal circumference [AC] < 10th percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler or fall in AC from 20-week scan of > 40 percentile points). The primary outcome was a composite of abnormal condition at birth or major neonatal morbidity. UCR was categorized as normal (< 0.9) or abnormal (≥ 0.9). UCR was assessed by gestational age at measurement interval to delivery, and by individual linear regression coefficient in women with two or more measurements.

RESULTS

856 women had 2770 measurements; 696 (81 %) had more than one measurement (median 3 (IQR 2-4). At inclusion, 63 (7 %) a UCR ≥ 0.9. These delivered earlier and had a lower birth weight and higher incidence of adverse outcome (30 % vs. 9 %, relative risk 3.2; 95 %CI 2.1-5.0) than women with a normal UCR at inclusion. Repeated measurements after an abnormal UCR at inclusion were abnormal again in 67 % (95 %CI 55-80), but after a normal UCR the chance of finding an abnormal UCR was 6 % (95 %CI 5-7 %). The risk of composite adverse outcome was similar using the first or subsequent UCR values.

CONCLUSION

An abnormal UCR is likely to be abnormal again at a later measurement, while after a normal UCR the chance of an abnormal UCR is 5-7 % when repeated weekly. Repeated measurements do not predict outcome better than the first measurement, most likely due to the most compromised fetuses being delivered after an abnormal UCR.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Gynaecology

UniBE Contributor:

Raio, Luigi

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0172-4614

Publisher:

Thieme

Language:

English

Submitter:

Monika Zehr

Date Deposited:

02 Feb 2022 16:26

Last Modified:

09 Feb 2023 00:11

Publisher DOI:

10.1055/a-1511-8293

PubMed ID:

34768305

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/163874

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/163874

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback