Mumenthaler, Fabian; Eckhart, Michael; Nagel, Siegfried (2022). Ethically guided research in network science in inclusive primary classes: A comparison of two methods. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung, 15(1), pp. 119-135. Springer 10.1007/s42278-021-00129-4
|
Text
Mumenthaler2022_Article_EthischGeleiteteNetzwerkforsch.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview |
Sociometric procedures often face ethical concerns. Therefore, the need for legitimization is high—especially in inclusion research. In this study it is argued that it is difficult to provide empirical evidence for ethically acceptable instruments. Thus, ethical aspects should already be considered in test construction. Using intrarater reliability with 109 and exponential random graph models with 77 inclusive primary classes we test whether two sociometric survey methods lead to similar results: one is a common friendship peer nomination; the other is an ethically thought-through interaction peer rating (Sozio). The comparison shows a strong similarity between the friendship and interaction networks.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Sport Science (ISPW) 07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Sport Science (ISPW) > Sport Sociology and Management |
UniBE Contributor: |
Mumenthaler, Fabian, Nagel, Siegfried |
Subjects: |
700 Arts > 790 Sports, games & entertainment |
ISSN: |
1865-3553 |
Publisher: |
Springer |
Language: |
German |
Submitter: |
Edith Desideria Imthurn |
Date Deposited: |
07 Feb 2022 11:49 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 16:04 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s42278-021-00129-4 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Inklusive Bildung, Soziale Netzwerke, Kognitive Beeinträchtigung, ERGM, Peernomination |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/164669 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/164669 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |