Biomechanical Response After Corneal Cross-linking With Riboflavin Dissolved in Dextran Solution Versus Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose

Fischinger, Isaak; Seiler, Theo G; Wendelstein, Jascha; Tetz, Kristin; Fuchs, Barbara; Bolz, Matthias (2021). Biomechanical Response After Corneal Cross-linking With Riboflavin Dissolved in Dextran Solution Versus Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose. Journal of refractive surgery, 37(9), pp. 631-635. Slack Inc. 10.3928/1081597X-20210610-04

Text Biomechanical_Response_After_Corneal_CXL_with_Ribo_in_Dextran_vs_HPMC_JRS.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (293kB) | Request a copy

Purpose: To evaluate corneal stiffening in porcine eyes induced by corneal cross-linking (CXL) using riboflavin dissolved in either aqueous dextran or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) solution.

Methods: Fifty-one porcine corneas were divided into three groups of 17 each. After deepithelialization, the first (Dresden) group was treated for 30 minutes with 0.1% riboflavin (riboflavin-5-monophosphate in 0.9% NaCl) dissolved in hypertonic 20% dextran and the second (HPMC) group for 30 minutes with isotonic solution containing 0.1% riboflavin and 1.1% HPMC. Thereafter, corneas of both groups were irradiated using 5.4 J/cm2 (irradiance of 9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes; 10*9). After CXL, all corneas were kept in an isotonic 16% dextran bath for 2 hours to obtain an equal hydration state. The third group served as the control group. Stress-strain measurements were performed on 5-mm-wide strips. Corneal thickness was monitored throughout the entire course of the experiments.

Results: The required stress for a 10% strain was increased by 83% in the Dresden group and 35% in the HPMC group compared to the control group. Resultant Young's modulus (at 10% strain) was 2.53 ± 0.73, 1.87 ± 0.50, and 1.47 ± 0.44 Pa for the Dresden, HPMC, and control groups, respectively. The differences between the Dresden and HPMC groups (P = .006), the Dresden and control groups (P < .001), and the HPMC and control groups (P = .014) were statistically significant. Pachymetry measurements showed a significantly increased corneal thickness after application of HPMC compared with the Dresden group (P = .002) and control group (P = .041).

Conclusions: The biomechanical stiffening of the cornea by CXL can be achieved using dextran- and HPMC-based riboflavin solutions in porcine corneas with an application time of 30 minutes. Dextran-based riboflavin solutions seem to induce a slightly stronger biomechanical response in this setting. HPMC solutions induce less thinning than dextran solutions.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 09 Mar 2022
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item