Kheur, Mohit; Lakha, Tabrez; Shaikh, Saleha; Kheur, Supriya; Qamri, Batul; Zhen, Lee Wan; Al-Haj Husain, Nadin; Özcan, Mutlu (2022). A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia. Materials, 15(6) Molecular Diversity Preservation International MDPI 10.3390/ma15062202
|
Text
materials-15-02202-v2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (28MB) | Preview |
This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using three different burs: diamond bur, modified diamond bur (zirconia specified), and tungsten carbide bur, along with a group of unprepared specimens that served as a control group. The study was divided into two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2. Surface roughness, surface hardness, and flexural strength were assessed before and after the grinding procedure to determine the 'best test group' in Phase 1. The best abrasive agent was selected for Phase 2 of the study. The specimens in Phase 2 underwent grinding with the best abrasive agent selected. Following the grinding, the specimens were then polished using commercially available diamond polishing paste, a porcelain polishing kit, and an indigenously developed low-temperature sintered zirconia slurry. The physical and mechanical properties were again assessed. Results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for their microstructure and crystalline phases, respectively. Grinding with diamond burs did not weaken zirconia (p > 0.05) but produced rougher surfaces than the control group (p < 0.05). Tungsten carbide burs did not significantly roughen the zirconia surface. However, specimens ground by tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced mean flexural strength (p < 0.05) and SEM revealed fine surface cracks. Phase transformation was not detected by XRD. Polishing with commercially available polishing agents, however, restored the surface roughness levels to the control group. Dental monolithic zirconia ground with tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced flexural strength and a smooth but defective surface. However, grinding with diamond burs roughened the zirconia surface. These defects may be reduced by polishing with commercially available polishing agents. The use of tungsten carbide burs for grinding dental zirconia should not be advocated. Grinding with diamond abrasives does not weaken zirconia but requires further polishing with commercially available polishing agents.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin |
ISSN: |
1996-1944 |
Publisher: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International MDPI |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
28 Mar 2022 09:22 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 16:17 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.3390/ma15062202 |
PubMed ID: |
35329653 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
X-ray diffraction analysis flexural strength hardness monolithic zirconia polishing |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/168143 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/168143 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |