Experience of hospital-initiated medication changes in older people with multimorbidity: a multicentre mixed-methods study embedded in the OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Multimorbid older people (OPERAM) trial.

Thevelin, Stefanie; Pétein, Catherine; Metry, Beatrice; Adam, Luise; van Herksen, Anniek; Murphy, Kevin; Knol, Wilma; O'Mahony, Denis; Rodondi, Nicolas; Spinewine, Anne; Dalleur, Olivia (2022). Experience of hospital-initiated medication changes in older people with multimorbidity: a multicentre mixed-methods study embedded in the OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Multimorbid older people (OPERAM) trial. BMJ quality & safety, 31(12), pp. 888-898. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014372

[img]
Preview
Text
Thevelin_BMJQualSaf_2022.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (904kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

A patient-centred approach to medicines optimisation is considered essential. The OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Multimorbid older people (OPERAM) trial evaluated the effectiveness of medication review with shared decision-making (SDM) in older people with multimorbidity. Beyond evaluating the clinical effectiveness, exploring the patient experience facilitates a better understanding of contextual factors and mechanisms affecting medication review effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To explore experiences of hospital-initiated medication changes in older people with multimorbidity.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre mixed-methods study, embedded in the OPERAM trial, combining semi-structured interviews and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) with a purposive sample of 48 patients (70-94 years) from four European countries. Interviews were analysed using the Framework approach. Trial implementation data on SDM were collected and the 9-item SDM questionnaire was conducted with 17 clinicians.

RESULTS

Patients generally displayed positive attitudes towards medication review, yet emphasised the importance of long-term, trusting relationships such as with their general practitioners for medication review. Many patients reported a lack of information and communication about medication changes and predominantly experienced paternalistic decision-making. Patients' beliefs that 'doctors know best', 'blind trust', having limited opportunities for questions, use of jargon terms by clinicians, 'feeling too ill', dismissive clinicians, etc highlight the powerlessness some patients felt during hospitalisation, all representing barriers to SDM. Conversely, involvement of companions, health literacy, empathetic and trusting patient-doctor relationships, facilitated SDM. Paradoxical to patients' experiential accounts, clinicians reported high levels of SDM. The BMQ showed that most patients had high necessity and low concern beliefs about medicines. Beliefs about medicines, experiencing benefits or harms from medication changes, illness perception, trust and balancing advice between different healthcare professionals all affected acceptance of medication changes.

CONCLUSION

To meet patients' needs, future medicines optimisation interventions should enhance information exchange, better prepare patients and clinicians for partnership in care and foster collaborative medication reviews across care settings.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine > Centre of Competence for General Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Metry, Beatrice, Rodondi, Nicolas

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2044-5423

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Funders:

[222] Horizon 2020 ; [201] Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation (SBFI) = Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI)

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

31 Mar 2022 10:00

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 16:18

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014372

PubMed ID:

35351779

Uncontrolled Keywords:

chronic disease management medication safety patient satisfaction patient-centred care qualitative research

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/168623

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/168623

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback