Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Garweg, Justus G; Štefanickova, Jana; Hoyng, Carel; Niesen, Tobias; Schmelter, Thomas; Leal, Sergio; Sivaprasad, Sobha (2022). Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial. Advances in therapy, 39(6), pp. 2701-2716. Springer 10.1007/s12325-022-02119-z

Preview

Text Garweg2022_Article_DosingRegimensOfIntravitrealAf.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC). Download (601kB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION

The purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients with center-involving DME previously treated with IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year according to the European label.

METHODS

Patients received an initial dose of IVT-AFL at study baseline and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to treat-and-extend (T&E), pro re nata (PRN), or fixed regimens. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline (randomization) to Week 52.

RESULTS

Full analysis set comprised 458 patients (baseline mean BCVA: 72.5, 71.0, and 72.7 letters in the T&E, PRN, and fixed-dose groups, respectively). Patients received a mean (min-max) of 10.0 (2-14; T&E), 11.5 (1-25; PRN), and 12.3 (3-13; fixed) injections over 100 weeks, with 13.3 (4-23), 25.0 (3-29), and 16.1 (5-25) clinic visits, respectively. At Week 52, mean (± standard deviation) BCVA changes from baseline were + 0.5 ± 6.7 (T&E), + 1.7 ± 6.8 (PRN), and + 0.4 ± 6.7 (fixed-dosing) letters (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: T&E 0.01 [- 1.46, 1.47] and PRN 0.95 (- 0.52, 2.42) letters versus fixed dosing; p < 0.0001 for both non-inferiority tests [4-letter margin]). The IVT-AFL safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

The treatment burden associated with intravitreal injections for DME is lowest with T&E regimens, but there are a range of flexible IVT-AFL dosing regimens, allowing physicians to adopt an individualized treatment plan.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02818998.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

97 since deposited on 13 Apr 2022
38 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item