Evidence-Based Policymaking in Times of Acute Crisis: Comparing the Use of Scientific Knowledge in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy

Hadorn, Susanne; Sager, Fritz; Mavrot, Céline; Malandrino, Anna; Ege, Jörn Marius (2022). Evidence-Based Policymaking in Times of Acute Crisis: Comparing the Use of Scientific Knowledge in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63(2), pp. 359-382. Nomos 10.1007/s11615-022-00382-x

[img]
Preview
Text
Hadorn2022_Article_Evidence-BasedPolicymakingInTi.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (427kB) | Preview

This article studies how different systems of policy advice are suited to provide relevant knowledge in times of acute crisis. The notion of evidence-based policymaking (EBP) originated in the successful 1997 New Labour program in the United Kingdom to formulate policy based not on ideology but on sound empirical evidence. We provide a brief overview of the history of the concept and the current debates around it. We then outline the main characteristics of the policy advisory systems in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy through which scientific knowledge—in the form of either person-bound expertise or evidence generated through standard scientific processes—was fed into policy formulation processes before the COVID-19 crisis. Whereas EBP takes place in the form of institutionalized advisory bodies and draws on expertise rather than on evidence in Germany, the system in Switzerland focuses more on the use of evidence provided through external mandates. Italy has a hybrid politicized expert system. The article then analyzes how this different prioritization of expertise vs. evidence in the three countries affects policymakers’ capacity to include scientific knowledge in policy decisions in times of acute crisis. The comparison of the three countries implies that countries with policy advisory systems designed to use expertise are better placed to incorporate scientific knowledge into their decisions in times of acute crisis than are countries with policy advisory systems that relied primarily on evidence before the COVID-19 crisis.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

11 Centers of Competence > KPM Center for Public Management

UniBE Contributor:

Hadorn, Susanne (A), Sager, Fritz, Mavrot, Céline Hélène Jeanne, Malandrino, Anna, Ege, Jörn Marius

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 350 Public administration & military science
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science

ISSN:

0032-3470

Publisher:

Nomos

Language:

English

Submitter:

Leroy James Amyas Ramseier

Date Deposited:

18 May 2022 11:36

Last Modified:

29 Mar 2023 23:38

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s11615-022-00382-x

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/169865

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/169865

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback