Evaluating alternative methods of comparing antihypertensive treatment intensity.

Aubert, Carole E; Chan, Chiao-Li; Terman, Samuel W; Hofer, Timothy P; Ha, Jin-Kyung; Cushman, William C; Sussman, Jeremy; Min, Lillian (2022). Evaluating alternative methods of comparing antihypertensive treatment intensity. The American journal of managed care, 28(5), e157-e162. Managed Care & Healthcare Communications 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89146

Text AJMC_05_2022_Aubert_final.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (471kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES

To change blood pressure treatment, clinicians can modify medication count or dose. However, existing studies have measured count modification, which may miss clinically important dose change in the absence of count change. This research demonstrates how dose modification captures more information about management than medication count alone.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We included patients 65 years and older with established primary care at the Veterans Health Administration (July 2011-June 2013). We captured medication count and standardized dose change over 90 to 120 days using a validated pharmacy fill algorithm. We determined frequency of dose change without count change (and vice versa), no change in either, change in same direction ("concordant"), and change in opposite direction ("discordant"). We compared change according to systolic blood pressure (SBP) and compared concordance using a minimum threshold definition of dose change of at least 50% (instead of any change) of baseline dose modification.

RESULTS

Among 440,801 patients, 64.2% had dose change; 22.0%, count change; 35.6%, no change in either; 42.4%, dose change without count modification; and 0.2%, count change without dose modification. Discordance occurred in 2.1% of observations. Using the minimum threshold definition of change, 68.7% had no change in either dose or count. Treatment was more frequently changed at SBP greater than 140 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring change in antihypertensive treatment using medication count frequently missed an isolated dose change in treatment modification and less often misclassified regimen modifications where there was no modification in total dose. In future research, measuring dose modification using our new algorithm would capture change in hypertension treatment intensity more precisely than current methods.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 17 May 2022
1 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item