External validation of three lymph node ratio-based nomograms predicting survival using an international cohort of patients with resected pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma.

Schneider, Michael; Labgaa, Ismail; Vrochides, Dionisios; Zerbi, Alessandro; Nappo, Gennaro; Perinel, Julie; Adham, Mustapha; van Roessel, Stijn; Besselink, Marc; Mieog, J Sven D; Groen, Jesse V; Demartines, Nicolas; Schäfer, Markus; Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain (2022). External validation of three lymph node ratio-based nomograms predicting survival using an international cohort of patients with resected pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma. European journal of surgical oncology EJSO, 48(9), pp. 2002-2007. Elsevier 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.002

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0748798322004279-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (877kB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION

Lymph node ratio (LNR) is an important prognostic factor of survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to validate three LNR-based nomograms using an international cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive PDAC patients who underwent upfront pancreatoduodenectomy from six centers (Europe/USA) were collected (2000-2017). Patients with metastases, R2 resection, missing LNR data, and who died within 90 postoperative days were excluded. The updated Amsterdam nomogram, the nomogram by Pu et al., and the nomogram by Li et al. were selected. For the validation, calibration, discrimination capacity, and clinical utility were assessed.

RESULTS

After exclusion of 176 patients, 1'113 patients were included. Median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 23 months (95% CI: 21-25). For the three nomograms, Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant OS diminution with increasing scores (p < 0.01). All nomograms showed good calibration (non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow tests). For the Amsterdam nomogram, area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for 3-year OS was 0.64 and 0.67 for 5-year OS. Sensitivity and specificity for 3-year OS prediction were 65% and 59%. Regarding the nomogram by Pu et al., AUROC for 3- and 5-year OS were 0.66 and 0.70. Sensitivity and specificity for 3-year OS prediction were 68% and 53%. For the Li nomogram, AUROC for 3- and 5-year OS were 0.67 and 0.71, while sensitivity and specificity for 3-year OS prediction were 63% and 60%.

CONCLUSION

The three nomograms were validated using an international cohort. Those nomograms can be used in clinical practice to evaluate survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Graduate School:

Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS)

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1532-2157

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

25 May 2022 12:29

Last Modified:

01 Oct 2022 00:12

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.002

PubMed ID:

35606276

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Mortality Pancreas cancer Pancreatoduodenectomy Prediction Prognosis

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/170253

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/170253

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback