Cuénod, Aline; Aerni, Martina; Bagutti, Claudia; Bayraktar, Banu; Boz, Efe Serkan; Carneiro, Cynthia Beisert; Casanova, Carlo; Coste, Alix T; Damborg, Peter; van Dam, Dick; Demirci, Mehmet; Drevinek, Pavel; Dubuis, Olivier; Fernandez, José; Greub, Gilbert; Hrabak, Jaroslav; Yiğitler, Gülen Hürkal; Hurych, Jakub; Jensen, Thøger Gorm; Jost, Géraldine; ... (2023). Quality of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectra in Routine Diagnostics: Results from an International External Quality Assessment including 36 Laboratories from 12 countries using 47 challenging bacterial strains. Clinical microbiology and infection, 29(2), pp. 190-199. Elsevier 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.017
|
Text
1-s2.0-S1198743X22002737-main.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (366kB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVE
MALDI-TOF MS is a widely used method for bacterial species identification. Incomplete databases and mass spectral quality (MSQ) still represent major challenges. Important proxies for MSQ are: number of detected marker masses, reproducibility, and measurement precision. We aimed to assess MSQs across diagnostic laboratories and the potential of simple workflow adaptations to improve it.
METHODS
For baseline MSQ assessment, 47 diverse bacterial strains which are challenging to identify by MALDI-TOF MS, were routinely measured in 36 laboratories from 12 countries, and well defined MSQ features were used. After an intervention consisting of detailed reported feedback and instructions on how to acquire MALDI-TOF mass spectra, measurements were repeated and MSQs were compared.
RESULTS
At baseline, we observed heterogeneous MSQ between the devices, considering the median number of marker masses detected (range = [5, 25]), reproducibility between technical replicates (range = [55%, 86%]), and measurement error (range = [147 parts per million (ppm), 588ppm]). As a general trend, the spectral quality was improved after the intervention for devices which yielded low MSQs in the baseline assessment: for 4/5 devices with a high measurement error, the measurement precision was improved (p-values<0.001, paired Wilcoxon test); for 6/10 devices, which detected a low number of marker masses, the number of detected marker masses increased (p-values<0.001, paired Wilcoxon test).
CONCLUSION
We have identified simple workflow adaptations, which, to some extent, improve MSQ of poorly performing devices and should be considered by laboratories yielding a low MSQ. Improving MALDI-TOF MSQ in routine diagnostics is essential for increasing the resolution of bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF MS, which is dependent on the reproducible detection of marker masses. The heterogeneity identified in this EQA requires further study.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathobiology (DIP) > Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology 04 Faculty of Medicine > Service Sector > Institute for Infectious Diseases > General Bacteriology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Casanova, Carlo, Kittl, Sonja Cornelia |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 630 Agriculture |
ISSN: |
1469-0691 |
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
30 May 2022 14:52 |
Last Modified: |
27 May 2023 00:25 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.017 |
PubMed ID: |
35623578 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Bacterial Species Identification Diagnostic Performance External Quality Assessment MALDI-TOF MS Quality Control Standardisation |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/170301 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/170301 |