New, Useful Criteria for Assessing the Evidence of Infection in Sepsis Research.

Mellhammar, Lisa; Elén, Sixten; Ehrhard, Simone; Bouma, Hjalmar; Ninck, Lorenz; Muntjewerff, Eva; Wünsch, Daniel; Bloos, Frank; Malmström, Erik; Linder, Adam (2022). New, Useful Criteria for Assessing the Evidence of Infection in Sepsis Research. Critical care explorations, 4(5), e0697. Wolters Kluwer Health 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000697

Preview

Text New__Useful_Criteria_for_Assessing_the_Evidence_of.18.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (902kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

The Sepsis-3 definition states the clinical criteria for sepsis but lacks clear definitions of the underlying infection. To address the lack of applicable definitions of infection for sepsis research, we propose new criteria, termed the Linder-Mellhammar criteria of infection (LMCI). The aim of this study was to validate these new infection criteria.

DESIGN

A multicenter cohort study of patients with suspected infection who were admitted to emergency departments or ICUs. Data were collected from medical records and from study investigators.

SETTING

Four academic hospitals in Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Germany.

PATIENTS

A total of 934 adult patients with suspected infection or suspected sepsis.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Agreement of infection site classification was measured using the LMCI with Cohen κ coefficient, compared with the Calandra and Cohen definitions of infection and diagnosis on hospital discharge as references. In one of the cohorts, comparisons were also made to adjudications by an expert panel. A subset of patients was assessed for interobserver agreement.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The precision of the LMCI varied according to the applied reference. LMCI performed better than the Calandra and Cohen definitions (κ = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.59-0.65] vs κ = 0.43 [95% CI, 0.39-0.47], respectively) and the diagnosis on hospital discharge (κ = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53-0.61] vs κ = 0.43 [95% CI, 0.39-0.47], respectively). The interobserver agreement for the LMCI was evaluated in 91 patients, with agreement in 77%, κ = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.85). When tested with adjudication as the gold standard, the LMCI still outperformed the Calandra and Cohen definitions (κ = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.70] vs κ = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.24-0.33], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The LMCI is useful criterion of infection that is intended for sepsis research, in and outside of the ICU. Useful criteria for infection have the potential to facilitate more comparable sepsis research and exclude sepsis mimics from clinical studies, thus improving and simplifying sepsis research.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

70 since deposited on 30 May 2022
36 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item