PyGeoT: A tool to automate mineral selection for multicomponent geothermometry

Olguín-Martínez, María G.; Peiffer, Loïc; Dobson, Patrick F.; Spycher, Nicolas; Inguaggiato, Claudio; Wanner, Christoph; Hoyos, Angello; Wurl, Jobst; Makovsky, Kyle; Ruiz-Aguilar, Diego (2022). PyGeoT: A tool to automate mineral selection for multicomponent geothermometry. Geothermics, 104, p. 102467. Elsevier 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102467

	Text Olguin_MartinetEtAlGeothermics_22.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (8MB)
Preview	Text Olguin-MartinezEtAlGeothermicsAccepted.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (2MB) | Preview

Multicomponent solute geothermometry is a useful tool for estimating the temperature of a deep geothermal reservoir prior to exploration drilling. The method uses full water analyses to determine the temperature at which the saturation indices of an assemblage of reservoir minerals reflect equilibrium with the water. One of the challenges with this method is selecting the mineral assemblage to be used for the computations. A new pre- and post-processing tool, PyGeoT, has been developed to answer this question. PyGeoT (i) automates the selection of the mineral phases to be used with the multicomponent geothermometry software GeoT-iGeoT, (ii) performs sensitivity analyses, and (iii) graphs the results for visualization of the data. The performance of PyGeoT and several classical solute geothermometers is tested using simulated and real water compositions from low-medium temperature geothermal systems. A reactive transport model reveals that PyGeoT provides reasonable reservoir temperature estimates even when only partial chemical equilibrium is reached, which is useful for exploring for low-medium temperature systems. In addition to estimating reservoir temperature, PyGeoT has the potential to identify the silica polymorph controlling SiO2 solubility and alteration minerals without site-specific mineralogical analysis, which is a clear advantage compared to silica geothermometers. Limitations of the method and classical geothermometers are discussed using both synthetic and real data. Finally, recommendations for the application of multicomponent geothermometry are presented.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

3 since deposited on 07 Jun 2022
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item