Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza; Kummer, Stefanie; Raguindin, Peter Francis; Dejanovic, Gordana; Taneri, Petek Eylul; Cardona, Isabel; Kastrati, Lum; Minder, Beatrice; Voortman, Trudy; Marques-Vidal, Pedro; Klodian, Dhana; Glisic, Marija; Muka, Taulant (2022). Risk prediction models of natural menopause onset: a systematic review [supplementary materials].
|
Text (Search strategies, suppl. materials, figures & tables)
Supplementary_Materials.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Authors hold Copyright Download (507kB) | Preview |
Context
Predicting the onset of menopause is important for family planning and to ensure prompt intervention in women at risk of developing menopause-related diseases.
Objective
To summarize risk prediction models of natural menopause onset and their performance.
Data Sources and Study Selection
Five bibliographic databases were searched up to March 2022. We included prospective studies on perimenopausal women or women in menopausal transition, that reported either an univariable or a multivariable model for risk prediction of natural menopause onset.
Data Extraction
Two authors independently extracted data according to the CHARMS (critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies) checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST (prediction model risk of bias assessment tool).
Data Synthesis
Of 8'132 references identified, we included 14 articles based on 8 unique studies comprising 9'588 women (mainly Caucasian) and 3'289 natural menopause events. All the included studies used onset of natural menopause (ONM) as outcome, while four studies predicted early ONM as well. Overall, there were 180 risk prediction models investigated, with age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) being the most investigated predictors. Other studies tested different hormones (Estradiol, Inhibin B), lifestyle factors (pack-years of smoking, body mass index), imaging (antral follicle count), menopause symptoms (hot flashes, night sweats) or menstrual flow variability as predictors. Estimated C-statistic for the prediction models ranged from 0.62 to 0.95. Calibration and validation were reported in five and seven articles, respectively. All studies were rated at high risk of bias mainly due to the methodological concerns related to the statistical analysis.
Conclusion
Applicability and generalizability of current prediction models on ONM is limited given that these models were generated from studies at high risk of bias and from specific populations/ethnicities. Although in certain settings such models may be useful, efforts to improve their performance are needed as use becomes more widespread.
Item Type: |
Other |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM) 13 Central Units > Administrative Director's Office > University Library of Bern |
UniBE Contributor: |
Raeisidehkordi, Hamidreza, Kummer, Stefanie, Raguindin, Peter Francis, Taneri, Petek Eylul, Kastrati, Lum, Minder, Beatrice, Glisic, Marija, Muka, Taulant |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services 000 Computer science, knowledge & systems > 020 Library & information sciences |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Beatrice Minder Wyssmann |
Date Deposited: |
24 Jun 2022 15:06 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 16:21 |
Related URLs: |
|
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Risk prediction model, Onset of menopause, Perimenopause, Premenopausal women |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/170883 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/170883 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |