Invernizzi, Alessandro; Carreño, Ester; Pichi, Francesco; Munk, Marion R; Agarwal, Aniruddha; Zierhut, Manfred; Pavesio, Carlos (2023). Experts Opinion: OCTA vs. FFA/ICG in Uveitis - Which Will Survive? Ocular immunology and inflammation, 31(8), pp. 1561-1568. Taylor & Francis 10.1080/09273948.2022.2084421
Text
document.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (6MB) |
Will optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) replace invasive imaging techniques like fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green (ICG) angiography entirely? While OCTA is being increasingly applied in the field of medical retina, will we see this change in the subspeciality of uveitis? In this article, five uveitis specialists with renowned imaging expertise answer to 10 specific questions to address this issue. The final verdict based on the comments of the experts suggests that FFA and ICG cannot be replaced by OCTA in uveitis, at least for now. While OCTA can offer new insights into the pathogenesis of certain inflammatory conditions and help in the diagnosis of complications like inflammatory choroidal neovascularisation, multimodal imaging is still the preferred approach in the assessment of patients with uveitis.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Further Contribution) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Ophthalmology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Munk, Marion |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1744-5078 |
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
08 Jul 2022 09:43 |
Last Modified: |
04 Oct 2023 00:11 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1080/09273948.2022.2084421 |
PubMed ID: |
35797139 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Experts opinion OCTA fluorescein angiography inflammation optical coherence tomography |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/171184 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/171184 |