The drug titration paradox: more drug does not correlate with more effect in individual clinical data.

Schnider, Thomas W; Minto, Charles F; Luginbühl, Martin; Egan, Talmage D (2022). The drug titration paradox: more drug does not correlate with more effect in individual clinical data. British journal of anaesthesia, 129(6), pp. 861-867. Oxford University Press 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.036

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0007091222003014-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (605kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

A fundamental concept in pharmacology is that increasing dose increases drug effect. This is the basis of anaesthetic titration: the dose is increased when increased drug effect is desired and decreased when reduced drug effect is desired. In the setting of titration, the correlation of doses and observed drug effects can be negative, for example increasing dose reduces drug effect. We have termed this the drug titration paradox. We hypothesised that this could be explained, at least in part, by intrasubject variability. If the drug titration paradox is simply an artifact of pooling population data, then a mixed-effects analysis that accounts for interindividual variability in drug sensitivity should 'flip' the observed correlation, such that increasing dose increases drug effect.

METHODS

We tested whether a mixed-effects analysis could correctly reveal the underlying pharmacology using previously published data obtained during automatic feedback control of mean arterial pressure (MAP) with alfentanil (effect site concentration, CeAlf) during surgery. The relationship between MAP and CeAlf was explored with linear regression and a linear mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

A linear mixed-effects model did not identify the correct underlying pharmacology because of the presence of the titration paradox in the individual data.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between drug dose and drug effect must be determined under carefully controlled experimental conditions. In routine care, where the effect is profoundly influenced by varying clinical conditions and drugs are titrated to achieve the desired effect, it is nearly impossible to draw meaningful conclusions about the relationship between dose and effect.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Luginbühl, Martin

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0007-0912

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

25 Jul 2022 14:09

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 16:22

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.036

PubMed ID:

35863951

Uncontrolled Keywords:

alfentanil drug titration paradox feedback control pharmacodynamics pharmacokinetics titration

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/171505

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/171505

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback