Comparing treatment of proximal phalangeal fractures with intramedullary screws versus plating.

Silins, Kaspars; Turkmen, Tutku; Vögelin, Esther; Haug, Luzian C P (2022). Comparing treatment of proximal phalangeal fractures with intramedullary screws versus plating. (In Press). Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery Springer 10.1007/s00402-022-04516-z

[img]
Preview
Text
s00402-022-04516-z.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

PURPOSE

Phalangeal fractures are the most common injuries in humans and account for approximately 10% of all fractures. With plate fixation, anatomic reduction is achievable in most cases, but extension lag is seen in up to 67%. Intramedullary headless screw offers treatment of unstable proximal phalangeal fractures using a minimally invasive procedure with very few complications. One of the major disadvantages of this technique is the transarticular screw position, damaging the articular surface and thus preventing very proximal fractures from being treated with a distally inserted screw. In this study, we present a modified approach to the fixation of the proximal phalangeal fractures and compare outcomes with plate osteosynthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with 31 comparable fractures of the proximal phalanx were treated either with a plate (14) or with minimal invasive cannulated compression screw (17). Pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), work disability and QuickDASH score were assessed.

RESULTS

TAM was significantly better in the screw group. The extension lag was worse in the plate group. Plate removal had to be performed in 13 of 14 the cases, while the screw had to be removed in only 3 cases. The average duration of work disability was 9.9 weeks in the plate group, compared to 5.6 weeks in the screw group.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive screw osteosynthesis not only has the advantage of significantly shorter work disabilities, but also shows remarkably improved postoperative range of motion. In contrast to plate osteosynthesis, removal of the screw is only necessary in exceptional cases. With the antegrade screws position, even difficult fractures close to the base can be treated without destroying any articular surface. In proximal phalanx fractures with both options of plate or single-screw osteosynthesis, we recommend minimal invasive cannulated screw osteosynthesis.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Plastic and Hand Surgery > Hand Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Plastic and Hand Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Silins, Kaspars; Vögelin, Esther and Haug, Luzian Carlo Peter

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1434-3916

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

23 Aug 2022 14:20

Last Modified:

23 Aug 2022 14:20

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00402-022-04516-z

PubMed ID:

35994095

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Intramedullary screw osteosynthesis Phalangeal fracture Plate Proximal phalanx

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/172259

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/172259

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback