Safety and Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting with the CGuard Double-layer Stent in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Klail, Tomas; Kurmann, Christoph; Kaesmacher, Johannes; Mujanovic, Adnan; Piechowiak, Eike I; Dobrocky, Tomas; Pilgram-Pastor, Sara; Scutelnic, Adrian; Heldner, Mirjam R; Gralla, Jan; Mordasini, Pasquale (2023). Safety and Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting with the CGuard Double-layer Stent in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Clinical neuroradiology, 33(1), pp. 237-244. Springer-Verlag 10.1007/s00062-022-01209-3

[img]
Preview
Text
s00062-022-01209-3.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (486kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Double-layer stents show promising results in preventing periinterventional and postinterventional embolic events in elective settings of carotid artery stenting (CAS). We report a single-center experience with the CGuard stent in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion with or without intracranial occlusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who received a CGuard stent in the setting of AIS at our institution. Neuroimaging and clinical data were analyzed with the following primary endpoints: technical feasibility, acute and delayed stent occlusion or thrombosis, distal embolism, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and functional outcome at 3 months.

RESULTS

In 33 patients, stenting with the CGuard was performed. Stent deployment was successful in all patients (28 with tandem occlusions, 5 with isolated ICA occlusion). Transient acute in-stent thrombus formation occurred in three patients (9%) without early stent occlusion. Delayed, asymptomatic stent occlusion was seen in 1 patient (3%) after 49 days. Asymptomatic periinterventional distal emboli occurred in 2 patients (6%), 1 patient experienced a transient ischemic attack 79 days after the procedure and 1 patient (3%) developed sICH. Favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) at 3 months was achieved in 12 patients (36%) and the mortality rate was 24%.

CONCLUSION

The CGuard use in emergencies was technically feasible, the safety has to be confirmed by further multicentric studies.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine (DRNN) > Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Neurology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine (DRNN) > Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology

UniBE Contributor:

Klail, Tomas, Kurmann, Christoph Carmelino, Kaesmacher, Johannes, Piechowiak, Eike Immo, Dobrocky, Tomas, Pilgram-Pastor, Sara Magdalena, Scutelnic, Adrian, Heldner, Mirjam Rachel, Gralla, Jan, Mordasini, Pasquale Ranato

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1869-1447

Publisher:

Springer-Verlag

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

08 Sep 2022 11:17

Last Modified:

15 Mar 2023 00:12

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00062-022-01209-3

PubMed ID:

36070140

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Embolism Emergency Recanalization Stenosis Tandem occlusion

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/172739

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/172739

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback