Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE-MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices).

Fraser, Alan G; Nelissen, Rob G H H; Kjærsgaard-Andersen, Per; Szymański, Piotr; Melvin, Tom; Piscoi, Paul (2021). Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE-MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices). EFORT open reviews, 6(10), pp. 839-849. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210081

[img]
Preview
Text
2058-5241-2058-5241.6.210081.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (734kB) | Preview

In the European Union (EU), the delivery of health services is a national responsibility but there are concerted actions between member states to protect public health. Approval of pharmaceutical products is the responsibility of the European Medicines Agency, while authorising the placing on the market of medical devices is decentralised to independent 'conformity assessment' organisations called notified bodies. The first legal basis for an EU system of evaluating medical devices and approving their market access was the Medical Device Directive, from the 1990s. Uncertainties about clinical evidence requirements, among other reasons, led to the EU Medical Device Regulation (2017/745) that has applied since May 2021. It provides general principles for clinical investigations but few methodological details - which challenges responsible authorities to set appropriate balances between regulation and innovation, pre- and post-market studies, and clinical trials and real-world evidence. Scientific experts should advise on methods and standards for assessing and approving new high-risk devices, and safety, efficacy, and transparency of evidence should be paramount. The European Commission recently awarded a Horizon 2020 grant to a consortium led by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, that will review methodologies of clinical investigations, advise on study designs, and develop recommendations for aggregating clinical data from registries and other real-world sources. The CORE-MD project (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices) will run until March 2024. Here, we describe how it may contribute to the development of regulatory science in Europe. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:839-849. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210081.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Endocrinology (DFKE) > Clinic of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2058-5241

Publisher:

The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Language:

English

Submitter:

Laura Goetschi

Date Deposited:

13 Dec 2022 15:43

Last Modified:

19 Dec 2022 11:57

Publisher DOI:

10.1302/2058-5241.6.210081

PubMed ID:

34760284

Additional Information:

CORE–MD Investigators: Lia Bally; Christoph Stettler

Uncontrolled Keywords:

clinical investigations evidence-based practice medical devices registries

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/175781

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/175781

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback