COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Siebenhofer, Andrea; Scott, Anna Mae; Avian, Alexander; Terebessy, András; Mergenthal, Karola; Schaffler-Schaden, Dagmar; Bachler, Herbert; Huter, Sebastian; Zelko, Erika; Murray, Amanda; Guppy, Michelle; Piccoliori, Giuliano; Streit, Sven; Jeitler, Klaus; Flamm, Maria (2022). COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, p. 1072515. Frontiers Research Foundation 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072515

Preview

Text fpubh-10-1072515.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients' first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

International cross-sectional online survey.

SETTING

General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff.

RESULTS

GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1-7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0-7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4-5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9-5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6-5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4-3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2-3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect staff (2.2 95% CI 1.9-2.4). Differences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries.

CONCLUSION

Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected differences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

17 since deposited on 06 Jan 2023
17 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item