Invasive electrophysiological testing to predict and guide permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis.

Siontis, Konstantinos C; Kara Balla, Abdalla; Cha, Yong-Mei; Pilgrim, Thomas; Sweda, Romy; Roten, Laurent; Reichlin, Tobias; Friedman, Paul A; Windecker, Stephan; Siontis, George C M (2023). Invasive electrophysiological testing to predict and guide permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis. Heart rhythm O2, 4(1), pp. 24-33. Elsevier 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.10.007

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S2666501822002793-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (558kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common. The value of electrophysiological study (EPS) for risk stratification of high-grade atrioventricular block (HG-AVB) and guidance of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is poorly defined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify EPS parameters associated with HG-AVB and determine the value of EPS-guided PPM implantation after TAVI.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the value of EPS parameters for risk stratification of TAVI-related HG-AVB and for guidance of PPM implantation among patients with equivocal PPM indications after TAVI.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (1230 patients) were eligible. In 7 studies, EPS was performed only after TAVI, whereas in 11 studies EPS was performed both before and after TAVI. Overall PPM implantation rate for HG-AVB was 16%. AV conduction intervals prolonged after TAVI, with the AH and HV intervals showing the largest magnitude of changes. Pre-TAVI HV >70 ms and the absolute value of the post-TAVI HV interval were associated with subsequent HG-AVB and PPM implantation with odds ratios of 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-5.81; P = .04) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.03-1.17; P = .02; per 1-ms increase), respectively. In 10 studies, PPM was also implanted due to abnormal EPS findings in patients with equivocal PPM indications post-TAVI (typically new left bundle branch block or transient HG-AVB). Among them, the rate of long-term PPM dependency was 57%.

CONCLUSION

Selective EPS testing may assist in the risk stratification of post-TAVI HG-AVB and in the guidance of PPM implantation, especially in patients with equivocal PPM indications post-TAVI.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Pilgrim, Thomas, Sweda, Romy, Roten, Laurent, Reichlin, Tobias Roman, Windecker, Stephan, Siontis, Georgios

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2666-5018

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

31 Jan 2023 13:11

Last Modified:

01 Feb 2023 12:32

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.hroo.2022.10.007

PubMed ID:

36713040

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Aortic stenosis Electrophysiological study Permanent pacemaker Risk stratification Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/178133

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/178133

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback