Impact of different brushing/abrasion protocols on erosive tooth wear for in vitro studies.

Sakae, Letícia Oba; Renzo, Ana Luísa Meira; Viana, Ítallo Emídio Lira; Niemeyer, Samira H; Saads Carvalho, Thiago; Scaramucci, Taís (2023). Impact of different brushing/abrasion protocols on erosive tooth wear for in vitro studies. Archives of oral biology, 148(105657), p. 105657. Elsevier Science 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105657

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S0003996923000456-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (383kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of different toothbrushing (with dentifrice) protocols on the progression of erosive tooth wear for in vitro studies.

DESIGN

Bovine enamel specimens were randomly distributed into 12 experimental groups (n = 10), according to the study factors: (1) brushing movement (horizontal or circular); (2) slurry diluent (artificial saliva or distilled water); (3) toothpaste dilution ratio (1:2, 1:3 or 1:4). A 5-day erosion-abrasion cycling model was performed, each consisting of 4 erosive challenges (0.3 % citric acid, pH=2.6) followed by 60 min exposure to artificial saliva. Brushing with fluoride toothpaste (15 s, 1400 ppm F-, AmF) was carried out 2x/day. Enamel surface loss (SL) was determined by optical profilometry. Data were statistically analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

SL was lower for the horizontal movement than for the circular (p = 0.044). There were no significant differences among the dilution ratios for artificial saliva. For distilled water, the more concentrated slurry (1:2) presented greater surface loss than the less concentrated slurries (1:3 and 1:4, p = 0.049 and p = 0.014, respectively). Dilutions with artificial saliva at ratios 1:3 and 1:4 presented higher surface loss than with distilled water (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively); however, for 1:2 ratio, there were no significant differences between the diluents.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro progression of enamel SL was influenced by the brushing movement, as well as the combination of the dilution ratio and the diluent of the toothpaste slurry, and therefore, all these factors must be considered when comparing results from different studies.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Restorative Dentistry, Research
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry

UniBE Contributor:

Niemeyer, Samira Helena, Saads Carvalho, Thiago

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0003-9969

Publisher:

Elsevier Science

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

28 Feb 2023 16:04

Last Modified:

05 Mar 2023 00:20

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105657

PubMed ID:

36827929

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Enamel Erosive tooth wear Study design Surface loss Toothbrushing

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/179242

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/179242

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback